—“I never tag you on things Kurt but I wasn’t sure if you actually had ever seen this before”—
“War Castles Conspiracy Theory”
Thx. will review and comment – if only because I want a distraction at the moment.
— Overall CRITICISM of the abuse of the financial system is true. Everyone who reads The Mystery of Banking knows that.
— Many of us predicted it, many of us knew what was going on, the problem is that we had no way of stopping it, because the experiment had resulted in a deterministic trap that states can’t get out of.
— Overall Premise is false: There is no secret – it’s that the public does not understand the institutions, and the incentives of the people in the institutions – or the extreme difficulty in changing the current system without some crisis or other because of the follow on effects of change.
— Overall criticism is false: the problem is the ‘bait’ of financialization created demand for continuous hyperconsumption – analogous to the potato famine: we have “up-populated, up-spent, up-debted” the population to where the only capital reserves are the ability of governments to borrow money from their future revenues (indebt the people).
— Overall Enemy is the self-interest of the Jewish and European Left pursuing their utopian vision of man (Authoritarian Communism, or slightly less authoritarian democratically legitimized authoritarian state socialism) in a one world government bent on taking down the west. That’s true.
— This kind of argument is also ridiculous: Paperwork does not create legitimacy- it provides instruction to members of organizations on the agreement of methods of processing. That entire narrative is ridiculous nonsense. This is ridiculous. Why? This is why our best people used to go into government: because they are better at the detection of error. Many people can do the work. Few people can detect error.
— He overstates any contribution by these folks. I am more than trivially aware of the fellow’s work on grammar because of course that’s what I do as well.
— Annoyingly dramatic. Layers of nonsense upon nonsense.
This guy is a great example of what the Abrahamic method of deception does to the mind of a dimwit or midwit, with enough competence to read but not enough to understand. He is doing what most people who seek to operate above their Dunning Kruger capability and finding conspiracy in a network of natural human incentives. As I’m listening, he’s showing signs of paranoid behavior because he is over his head – which is what people do. Why? Because we have insufficient sense of order and control, and we all need to feel in control of our world-frame (model), and males, in particular, are biased to political (like he is) while females the interpersonal (sjw’s). He’s an absolute nutcase.
It terrifies me that (a) idiots think like this – that they think they can assemble self-selected facts into a self-constructed narrative. (b) there are idiots that believe this nonsense. (c) there are idiots that defend this nonsense. (d) and that people would rather stay at home and listen to morons like this than show up and fight for their natural rights under natural law, and the constitution that enumerates them, a judiciary that enforces them, and a military that enforces those judgments.
There is no hope for the right. There never was. Unless all men are in the military (responsibility for the polity), and the economy (business) or out of the state and economy by the church (responsible for self and family) they are too incompetent for independent political judgment.
Christianity is to blame. It’s not what I expected to find. But it’s the reason. You don’t realize that this kind of thinking is abrahamic (scriptural) but I do. Why? Because only scripturalism can produce this degree of disconnect. We don’t even find this in rural chinese peasants. We only find it in abrahamics.
Color me exasperated.