Part 1

The Natural Law of the European Peoples

The group evolutionary strategy of the European peoples has remained constant for thousands of years, through the bronze, iron, Mediterranean, continental, steel, naval colonial, and post-war, periods and our traditional law that reinforced that strategy remained constant independent of the various attempts at organizing rule.

In this section we codify for the first time, The Natural Law of the European Peoples in ratio-scientific form, not only to explain, and inform, but to prevent repetition of the dark ages past and present, and to provide for the European peoples that which others have codified: a logic and body of law beyond which none may tread by display word or deed – especially those in the military, state, government, treasury, and academy.

The European People

( … )

1. The Europeans

The Law of the European People

The west never had a bible – just a canon; and that canon was written in multiple frames, including scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological.

Philosophy, theology, and tradition are just narratives that explain a group strategy in a grammar of wishes. Law is the evidence of what actually occurs, not what is wished for. Our Founding Fathers, through generations of the English civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution. But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because of programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program. They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church.

The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the immoral left, combined with Anti-whiteness, under the guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery (not unique to whites at all) provided the means of undermining that narrative, and

So we must complete the greco-roman-germanic-anglo-american research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation.

We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to Jewish law and Muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the social-political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation.

We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread.

Heroism and excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war.

That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty – and its consequences.

2. The Law of The European People

Our Achievements

( … link … )

Our Failings

( … link … l

. . .

. . .

Part 2

Mankind ( Descriptive )


1. Man

2. Mind and Consiousness

3. Sex Differences

4. Personality, Intelligence, Morality

6. Classes Differences

7. Species and Races



Man is the measure of all things to man. Meaning that man’s categories of cognition are determined by his brain structure and his brain structure is evolved and organized for humans to act at human scale.



All behavior is reducible to the incentive to acquire interests. We can enumerate those categories of interests we seek to acquire. we remember those things we have invested in as costs, and defend those costs. (our complex interests some of which are our possessions )

We provide a list of categories that explain the sum total of what people seek to acquire an ‘interest’ in.

Acquisition and Demonstrated Interest


Emotions Are Reactions to Changes in State of “capital”

Emotions are reactions to changes in state of “capital” that we either have, or might have: obtaining it, saving it, or holding options on past present and future utility of it. That utility can reduce our physical, intellectual, emotional, reproductive, or time costs. Our “values” influence us in the sense that the value we attribute to any given form of capital varies according to our gender, class, ability, condition, and inventory of existing capital.




AGENCY (will to power)

( … )



( … )


Cooperation (Ethics)


“Man Cooperates”

1 – Man must act cooperatively to disproportionately improve the acquisition of resources.
2 – Man must act to preserve and extend cooperation to preserve the disproportion­ate rewards of acquisition through cooperation.


We don’t start with morality. We start with needing an incentive not to engage in parasitism and predation which for the strong is the preferable state of affairs. The only incentive possible is reciprocity because of the long term gains of scale. Everyone else starts with the presumption that cooperation at any cost is a good. We start with the presumption that only reciprocity is a good. We are right and they are parasites.



Man is rational. He engages in predation when it suits him, parasitism when it is possible, cooperation when it is preferable, and flight when it is necessary.

Man is not good or bad, he is rational in his choice of cooperation, parasitism, or predation. We must provide him the incentive to choose cooperation. We must not pretend he does not need the incentive.

Thankfully, through organizing our efforts into myth, ritual, habit, norm, and law, we can raise the cost of predation and parasitism high enough so that man chooses cooperation or flight more often than parasitism or predation.

Our deprivation of his opportunity for parasitism and predation do not change the nature of man – because man is rational. We simply eliminate those less able to cooperate and produce, and provide disincentives to those that remain, thereby creating an imbalance of incentives and proclivity for cooperation and production.





( … )

1. Reciprocity 


Science absolutely positively can tell you the answer to ethics and morality.

Morality, including the moral instincts, consist in reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, where reciprocity consists of limiting our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer( trade, consumption, harm, destruction, loss) of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon demonstrated interests of others by externality. That’s morality. It’s got to be or evolution (physics) wouldn’t tolerate our existence as a species.

There is no difference between physics (involuntary change), economics (productive cooperation), and morality (social cooperation), except we have memory so can invest in and borrow from one another across time (. All that varies is the level of immorality tolerated given the stage of development in the current military, political, and economic circumstances.

So yes, science has told us what manners, ethics, morals, consist of. They cannot tell you what those range of actions will be in three years any more than economics can tell you that, because what constitutes reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, varies with the structure of production of polities, commons, goods, services, and information.

So we absolutely positively know what the physical and natural laws consist of – because they’re the same – we can judge borrow from one another or invest in one another and punish one another for violating those investments and borrowings (thefts, parasitism, free riding), and we do so by moral intuition we call “altruistic punishment’ – the payment of high personal costs of punishment of others to preserve the high value of trust in cooperation (borrowing, investing) in one another, because of the impossible-to-replace returns on cooperation – wherever cooperation is reciprocal: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary, transfers, and free of negative externality.

And good luck refuting that scientific claim – because you will not be able to without violating it. It’s a physical law of conscious, cooperative, species beyond which no conscious cooperative species can survive.

Evil < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good

2. Morality


( … )

Tolerance Forbearance


( … )


Production (Economics)

“Man Produces”


Our first resource is time. our development of action, sentience, intelligence, cooperation, division of labor, writing, narrative, numbers, money, accounting, reason, law and science serves to produce increasing returns on time. When we increase our numbers in physical space we decrease opportunity costs (time). When we increase incremental suppression of parasitism and free riding, we decrease transaction costs (time). trades, money, savings, store time – time to trade with others.




Intertemporal Division of Perception, Cognition, Knowledge, Labor, and Advocacy
Humans form a division of perception in that progressives and libertarians have specialist moral intuitions suited to their roles in the community, whereas conservatives give equal weight to the six moral dimensions of (care, fairness, liberty, loyalty, authority, purity). These differences on moral intuitions suit individuals to different roles in a polity:

      • “Conservatives” – Voluntary Organization of Cooperation.
      • “Libertarians” – Voluntary Organization of Production.
      • “Progressives” – Voluntary Organization of Reproduction.

Humans form a division of cognition in that we can classify people with different levels of ability, from those that learn by repetition, to those that learn by imitation, to those that learn by instruction, to those that learn by reading, to those that can model machines,to those that can synthesize ideas, to those that can model abstractions.

Humans form a division of knowledge with each containing local information about their inventories of property and specialist knowledge upon which others depend. As we depend more upon the memories and actions of third parties, trust becomes necessary for complex information networks to evolve between humans.

Humans form multiple divisions of labor, a reproductive division of labor between the genders in the production of new generations and a productive division of labor in the production of goods and services, as well as the production of commons.

Humans form a division of advocacy where conservatives advocate total constraint on consumption (saving), libertarians advocate meritocratic constraint on consumption (production), and progressives advocate consumption (nurture).


The Origin of Our Prosperity

“We are not wealthier than cavemen, we have merely made everything unimaginably cheaper by voluntarily cooperating in a vast division of perception, cognition, knowledge, advocacy, and labor, using institutions of calculation – all evolutions of language – and institutions that employ them, the most important of which is law and that law we call Tort.”

Division of Knowledge and Labor



Weights and Measures


Instrumentation, Information and Ignorance (and money)





(discount on the opportunity to inform, associate, produce…)

Signaling,   the conformative economy

Direction of Conformity

Manners, Ethics,  Morals, Traditions

Virtue Signaling Economy

Virtue Spirals

Competing Economies


(identity here)





“Man is Compatible not Equal”



Variation in Gender

Variation in Market Value to Others

Sexual, social, economic, political, military market value.


Information – Informational Market Value

Association – Social (Status) Market Value

Reproduction – Sexual Market Value

Cooperation – Cooperative market value

Production – Economic Market Value

Commons – Political Market Value

Polities – Coercive Market Value

Wars – Military Market Value


( …. )




(we sort as much as we organize – important, but not sufficiently explored concept – neighborhoods work etc.)

( …  )


( … ) (genetic sortition)



( … )



Each of the three classes, into which humans divide, specialize in one of the following three coercive technologies:

    • Moral Coercive Power – The use of “words and signals” in order to influence people to behave in a way by the threat of imposition of social costs (opportunity costs).
    • Economic Coercive Power – The use of “money and assets” in order to compel people to behave in a way by the promise of material rewards (good and services).
    • Physical Coercive Power – The use of “armies and weapons” in order to coerce people to behave in a way under the threat of physical violence (physical costs).

By combined use of the three weapons, a group can coerce quite effectively, the government can use all those weapons to keep control of its subjects, with most people being controlled by propaganda and lies (moral coercion), others being bought with a position in the bureaucracy (economic coercion) and the rest of the malcontents being suppressed by police force (physical coercion).

Intertemporal Division of Reproductive Perception Knowledge Labor and Advocacy: The difference between the feminine (short term), libertarian (medium term) and conservative (long term) moral biases constitutes an intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy.

The way we ‘calculate’ what is ‘good’ is through voluntary exchanges: cooperation. So the fact that we have different biases provides necessary and advantageous specializations, and our principal problem then is providing ‘markets’ by which we can cooperate and ‘calculate’ group needs through constant exchanges.

By choice of individual sovereignty, we limit ourselves to natural law. By the choice of natural law we limit ourselves to markets in everything. By limiting ourselves to markets in everything we produce markets for association, cooperation, mating and reproduction, production commerce and trade, the production of commons (government), and the production of polities (Armies and Territories and Rule).


For all intents and purposes, with wide individual variation, physical attractiveness (which yes, is a universal), fitness, IQ, and personality, serve as a rough indicator of class.

For all intents and purposes, intelligence serves as a personality trait – and perhaps the dominant personality trait.

For all intents and purposes, personality and physique require exercise in order to produce individual fitness. (This being the primary failure of the 20th century – personality training. )


Instead of one class hierarchy there are three. Societies are dominated by some arrangement of these three methods of coercion (Military and law, finance and commerce, priesthood and public intellectuals). Each fights for power, with the core of the population shifting under who best serves them, while at the same time protecting them from outside competition.

Within those classes we see genetic, social, and economic classes. Genetic roughly reflecting reproductive desirability. Social roughly reflecting manners, norms, and education, and economic/political reflecting achievements.




( …. ) division of civilizational labor


“Man Organizes”

The markets for organization:  normative, productive, social, political



Economic Orders


( … )




( … )





( … )

The Production of Commons

Civilization consists in the evolutionary institutional production of commons to defeat time at scale

( … )





Group Strategy


“Man Wars”

WAR ORDERS (Military Strategy)


. . .

. . .

Part 3

Limitation (Law)


In order to cooperate and expand cooperation, humans require incremental suppression of impositions of cost upon their demonstrated property as relationships move from local to global and become anonymous.

At first humans organize in order to partially suppress imposition of costs (criminal), namely violence, this results in innovations on parasitism that moves to theft and fraud (ethical), as those get suppressed, we have private property, but parasitism evolves towards deception and organized forms of parasitism (moral and conspiratorial).

(List of “discounts”:

As such one can judge the moral state of a polity by comparison with the list of all forms of free-riding and those which they actually suppress by their law.

By near total suppression of imposed costs and the absolute nuclear family, we force individuals into market cooperation instead of parasitism (which limits parasitism even within the family), this results in a highly eugenic (meritocratic) civilization which suppresses lower class reproduction.

In order to create incentives for the lower classes to abide by rule of law, they’re compensated with dividends obtained in exchange for forgone opportunities of parasitism and for the policing of the commons.







Humans defend commons into which they have invested resources, that follows from the definition of demonstrated property, as such, we can consider information as a commons and prohibit the “pollution” of that commons as we do with other commons such as rivers.

As such, a requirement of truthful speech (testimonialism) forms a new kind of warranty, just like warranties given to the quality of goods and services, we must now warrant any information we use in public discourse about matters of commons. This does not mean that we must prohibit conflationary and inspirational discourse in private, for pedagogical, aesthetic and hypothetical (meaningful) purposes.

Testimonialism stands as a warranty in matters of law (and contract), where the discovery of law must pass through all of the criticisms, for this reason we have both empiricism (as in the common law) and operationalism (strict construction).

While we protect the life, and property,  the contract of marriage, the physical commons (land, water, air, infrastructure), our institutional commons (govts, laws, even traditions), and even fine arts and monuments; and while we protect the market of products and the market for services, one thing we do not protect is the market for information. We can extend the demand for due diligence that we require in the markets for goods and services to the market for information. But that requires a test of truthful speech: a warranty of due diligence.

. . .

. . .

Part 4

The Method

Knowledge (Epistemology)




1. Adversarialism 

The Method

1. The Method  


( … )

2. The Arguments


If you study math, programming, the physical sciences, economics, or law, you will notice the similarity, in that there are n-number of software design patterns at every level of complexity; n-number of physical laws at every level of complexity; there are n-number of economic ideas at every level of complexity; and n-number of properties of law at contract, jurisprudence, and state authority; and you learn the economic ideas by the association with the author, and the legal ideas by association with a case; the programming ideas by label, example or function, and the mathematic ideas at every increase in dimensions (shapes) by the most absurd archaic nonsense language humanly possible.

That there is a regular, obvious pattern to the available operations at every level of complexity, where a level is defined as the set of operations possible before a subsequent operation is possible. In other words, you can’t make a molecule without an element, or an element without an elementary particle, or an elementary particle without the elementary forces.

This is what The Grammars in Propertarianism explain.

This particular pattern will explain language to you in a way that will explain all languages to you whether that language is one we speak, or one consisting of operations possible in the physical, sentient, and social world.

3. The Grammars



We increase the precision of the term ‘true’ by asking whether a question is decidable, presumptively good as a general rule, personally preferable,  useful, possible, undecidable, or unknowable.

|Decidability| decidable < presumptively good as a general rule < personally preferable < useful < possible <undecidable, < or unknowable

4. Decidability



Testimony that provides decidability satisfies the demand for infallibility.


5. Testimony

Due Diligence

6. Due Diligence


7. Warranty

8. Liability

9. Restitution, Punishment, Prevention

Strict Construction

10. Algorithmic (Strict) Construction


( … )

. . .

. . .

Part 5

Application of the Natural Law

( … )

1. Government and Law

2. Government

3. Law

4. Norms

5. Marriage and Family

6. Education

7. Economics

8. Physical Science

9. Mathematics

10. Philosophy

11. The Pseudosciences

12. Religion

The Pursuit of Non-False Religion

Natural Law (P-Law) is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love.

We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline.

The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

A non-false religion consists in one that is not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or the Law of Transcendence – the continued evolution of man into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws – math, science, natural law – that teaches us debt to nature, our ancestors, their heroes, those laws, and adherence to those laws.

That is the perfect, non false, religion.

If there is a god or are gods, that is the only religion commensurable with the evidence of their writing, and their words – the laws of the nature universe, and of natural law of man, and of the law of transcendence, the evolution of man into gods.

(Religion is answered in Part 2 below.)

13. Aesthetics

( … )

. . .

. . .

Part 6

An Indictment: A Case for War

A prosecutorial indictment of enemies past and present, as the cause of the conflict. There is blame for the enemy and blame for ourselves. But regardless of blame, we must act for not only our people, our civilization, but to protect mankind from its only existential threat from within.

(~6000 words.)

1. The Conflict  

The Century of The Jewish Counter-Revolution Against Darwin and Darwinian Civilization

European Civilization’s Eugenic, Darwinian, Strategy
The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of:
… self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life;

… the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible,

… advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses,

… allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.

Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.

The Restoration of European Civilization
I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization.
… 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin,
… 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain.
… 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation.
… 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization.

II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+
… 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume.
… 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation.

III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution
… 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s)
… 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s)

IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+
(Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)

1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
… The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
… (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
… (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
… (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
… (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
… (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution
(Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,)
… (a) (Ongoing.)

The History of The Jewish Counter-Revolution
1. Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
(Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples

The Group Strategy of The Left: Defeat Darwin to Facilitate Separatism.
The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction.

All political conflict is reducible to this question
The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution.
The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists.
The theological right only debates its cause.
This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason.

LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary
RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary.

Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate.
Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets.

2. The Histories

3. Religion

This Conflict that Undermines Our Civilization from Within.

Humans evolved at least three sets of faculties: the physical-sensory, the
intuitinistic-emotional, and the rational-intellectual. And we evolved ‘grammars’ (paradigms and logics) to express the experience of those faculties. Because those different experiences require different metrics(systems of measurement) and descriptions (analogies) of expression.

Scientific experience in scientific testimony, in expressions of empirical natural law (intellectual). Ordinary language for discourse for conduct of daily life (physical). And Mystical experience expressed in poetry, the development of mythical and religious structures that send one down a destination-less path into the ephemeral (intuitionistic-emotional).

The question is, must they be coherent compatible and commensurable even if they are expressed in different grammars: deflationary-scientific vs inflationary-poetic.

And my answer is yes.
There is no reason for conflict.
And it is this conflict that undermines our civlization from within.

We Know The Name of the Devil

Europeans speak in the language of the gods, written in the hand of the gods:
math, science, physical law, natural law, and testimony.

Christianity, Islam, Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Libertarianism and Neoconservatism all bait us into hazard — so do Freudianism, Boasianism, Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness, and Human-Biodiversity-Denialism. They teach us to lie. To Deny the language of the gods, written in the hands of the gods, and our means of transcendence into gods: evolution.

If you are a devil what do you seek?
To prevent man’s transcendence into gods.
To deny evolution: the means by which we transcend into gods ourselves.

If you are a devil what language would you speak?
What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the devil tell us?
The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. False promise of life after death, false promise of freedom from the physical and natural laws and the demands of evolution that transcend man into gods.

We know the name of the devil.
His name was Abraham.
He was from Ur.

4. The Crimes

5. The Lies

Supporting Documents

A Judgement

( … )

1. Judgment

2. Sentencing

3. Enforcement: Threats, Charges, and Duties

4. Letters of Marque 

. . .

. . .

Part 7

The Introduction to the Reformation And Revolution

This constitution isn’t just a proposal. It is an offer of the terms of settlement prior to the escalation of hostilities in what will be the bloodiest civil war in human history with consequence that propagate across globe, and alter the course of human history, on a scale not seen since the fall of the roman empire – worse than the world wars.  And as such a proposition for settlement is incomplete and insufficient without the threat of the promise of consequences if mutually tolerable terms are not met.

  1. A Revolution: The Introduction

The Declaration of Reformation

The Declaration, mirroring the original Declaration of Independence states the case for reformation of all governments under the existing constitution; the crimes that this government has allowed against our people; the condition of the federal government as one of empire against the interests of the people; the vulnerability of the governments and the empire;  an appeal to accept this constitution on moral grounds; and the threat we make if any resists;

  1. The Declaration

The Reformation of the Constitution

The preamble provides an explanation of the human need for political organizations, the development of the european contractual model of political organization; the purpose of a constitution as a means of engineering and operating such organizations; the unequalled success of the constitutional model of engineering and operating polities; the failures of our constitution, our jurists, and our people to adapt to innovations in violations of the Natural Law of the European Peoples; how to correct those failures; The demands of the current condition of our peoples; Our available choices for the correction of the current conditions under that law; The choice we propose; and the amendments to the existing constitution to bring

  1. The Preamble

The Articles

  1. Article I – Man
  2. Article II – The Law
  3. Article III – Rights and Obligations
    Video: Articles I, II, III.
  4. Article IV – The Court
  5. Article V Section I – The State
  6. Article V Section II – The Military, Regiments, and Militia
  7. Article V Section III – The Treasury
  8. Article V Section IV – The Insurer of Last Resort
  9. Article VI – The Government of the State
  10. Article VII – The Governments of the Several States
  11. Article VIII – The People
  12. Article IX – The Economy
  13. Article X – The Commons
  14. Article XI – Commerce and Cooperation
  15. Article XII – Marriage, Family, Children
  16. Article XIII – Training: Religion, Fitness, Education, Training,
  17. Article XIV – The Territories, Monuments, Arts, and Letters
  18. Article XV – Articles of Devolution

The Restitutions Upon Necessity of Revolutionary and  Civil War

  1. Article XVI – Restitutions and Punishments

Single Page, and Printable View:

The Constitution in a Single Document


Introductory Videos by John Mark

  1. Reciprocity
  2. The Number One Job of Government
  3. The Constitution – Overview (coming soon… )
  4. Harnessing the Power of Western Civilization
  5. Future Geostrategic Conditions
  6. Civil War 2 – Who Will Win?
  7. Civil War 2 – What Come After?

Note: The hierarchy of legal terms (Article, Section etc) is as under:

a) Article
b) Section
c) Rules
d) Regulations.
e) Clause

The Course and Conduct of A Civil War

—“The purpose of our position on civil war is to remind both sides that the unthinkable is not only thinkable, but possible, if not probable – and that’s why we need to take positive action to resolve our differences. And that we recommend peaceful separation.”— John and Curt

  • Fourth Generation Warfare: End of European Domestication of War
  • Optimum Strategy
  • Strategic Options and Historical Precedents (raid, raid-siege)

( … )

An Appeal to the Civilizations of the World

  • Eastern Europe (links to …)
  • Russia
  • India
  • China
  • Africa

And to Western Peoples:

  • Americans
  • Europeans
  • Canadians
  • Australians and New Zealanders

. . .

. . .