I realize you’re arguing leftism from within its frame. And while possible to understand it from within its frame, that frame is pseudoscientific(philosophical) and requires the scientific(testifiable) to falsify it.
To start with Ill try to clarify terms.
Literary Philosophy (Analogy) is Justificationary, for the purpose of Communication.
- Mythology (analogical wisdom, the natural )
- Wisdom Literature (wisdom authors – china, the wise )
- Persuasive Literary Philosophy (philosophers, the good)
- Rational Philosophy (Kant, secular theological, secular moral
- Natural Philosophy (Empiricists, Scientists, the true)
Logic (Consistency) is Falsificationary (Surviving)
- Positional logic (math)
- Set Logic (language)
- Algorithmic Logic (transformations)
- Operational Logic (actions)
Science (Causality) is Falsificationary (Surviving)
- [ Formal (Logical) ]
Law (Decidability) is Falsificationary (Surviving)
Two Sexes with Competing Strategies
The Genders differ in their competition, conflict and warfare strategy.
Males: Demonstrated Advantage, hierarchy, maintaining group cohesion (inequality) Truth under threat of violence in the service of male solidarity in the preservation of the Tribe and Territory is the competitive strategy of males. Males fight for position in the hierarchy and end conflict with increases in loyalty to one another.
— vs —
Females: Intrinsic Advantage, conformity, maintaining group cohesion under threat of reputation destruction in the service of female solidarity independent of Tribe and Territory is the competitive strategy of females. Females fight to destroy or kill without ending.
Adaptive Velocity Given Male and Female Differences in Reproductive Strategy
( … )
Mankind evolved into a superpredator. By Male political and physical (fast) and female social and informational (slow) superpredation.
Producing a spectrum of moral biases that constitute the individual’s demand for terms of cooperation
Cooperation is Disproportionately Rewarding Such That Survival Is Dependent Upon it.
Man Competes at Scale
There are many categories of markets within this spectrum:
… 1 – Associative, Social, Sexual, Cooperative, Economic, Informational, Political, and Military Markets
Man Organizes Cooperation at Scale
Obvious fact Man organizes. Man organizes to cooperate with those of common interests, and compete against those with competing common interests.
… 1 – Family,
… 2 – Friends, Acquaintances
… 3 – Interest Groups, Associations, Societies, Religions
… 4 – Associates, Partners, Employers, Vendors
… 5 – Intellectual, Media, Bureaucratic, Political Allies
… 6 – Economic Military and Strategic Alliances
… 1 – Physical: Force<->Defense (military-political)
… 1 – Physical: Force<->Defense (military-political) evolves into the State favoring the upper classes
The order in which a group develops these institutions anchors the civilization on the first, less so the second, and most civilizations are weak or fail at the third.
… 2 – Military > State > Law > Religion Fail (no example, Europe trying?)
… 3 – Military > State > Religion > Law Fail (China) – Expansion, and Assimilation but Slow growth and Stagnation
… 4 – Military > Religion > Weak State > Law Fail (India) – Stagnation/Vulnerability
… 5 – Military > Religion > State Fail > Law Fail (Islam) – Producing Diaspora and Decline
… 6 – Fail Military > Religion > Law Fail (asymmetric) > State Fail (Judaism) – Diasporic (fail at military and a people will always fail)
… 7 – Fail Military > Fail Religion > Fail State > Fail Law (Gypsies) – Diasporic
… 3. The Religious and Social Supernatural Demands (Universals) are Ideal and often Utopian. (individuals)
… 4 – The Imaginary: occult->supernatural->theology to overload: intuition and imagination.
… (c) A Mythology to communicate that metaphysical paradigm and the competitive strategy it contains by suggestion
… (d) An Argumentative methodology – a method of ‘argument’ or persuasion (“A Grammar: paradigm, vocabulary, logic”)
… 2. Aristotelian-Epicurean natural philosophy (Natural Philosophy)
… 3. Continental Rationalism and (literary philosophy)
… 5. Chinese Confucian “reasonable’ wisdom literature
… 7. Hindu Mythological wisdom literature
… 8. Abrahamism v1 (Judaism Christianity Islamv1, v2 , v3 (wahabi) ) – Conflation of Wisdom with Law, Mythology with History, Supernatural with Natural, as ‘theology’.
… 9. Abrahamism v2 (marxism, neo marxism-postmodernism, feminism-pc-woke-ism) – Pseudoscience and sophistry to deny the formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe – blaming the discoverers of those laws as if they were the creators of those laws. Where those laws of nature are not kind whatsoever but force constant adaptation.
… 2. Dialectic (negotiation),
… 7. Evading warranty and liability (unaccountability)
Because of the lack of necessity of producing commons – where commons cannot be privatized or consumed.
The Abrahamic civilizations (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) fail to produce commons and instaead ride on the host people or their upper classes.
… 2. Adversarial competition (falsification) – vs Dialectical Negotiation
Because of the necessity and utility of producing commons that cannot be privatized or consumed.
Europeans compete by the production of commons, and free riding is suppressed.
Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Marx, and the long line of neo-Marxists postmodernists anti-male feminists, and present pc-woke are all relying on unempirical (counter-empirical) empty verbalism to construct sophisticated falsehoods by a process of storytelling(suspension of disbelief) and suggestion (evading evidence and criticism) by baiting into the hazard with false promises of freedom from the four laws of the universe: the logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary.