Nov 3, 2019, 9:39 AM
(Michael Churchill )
There is no incentive for the people on the sub-optimal side of the curve to voluntarily go along with the extinction of their own DNA line.
There is declining incentive for the people at the top to enforce laws to prevent reproduction of those who are on the sub-optimal side of the curve.
And there are strong IN-centives for both capital and fifth-columnists to encourage reproduction on the sub-optimal side of the curve.
Overall human DNA is weakening in western societies, and the effect is cumulative over generations.
The Incentive for people on the sub-optimal side of the curve is compensation NOT to reproduce, as well as prosecution IF they reproduce.
I do see that. We’ve let it go too far. But if we isolate from the left though, I’m pretty sure there won’t be that many on the sub-optimal side of the spectrum. And ones that are, what can you really do with them besides paying them to obey the law and not reproduce, at least not more than one kid? If that’s not okay and they still commit crime, they need to be disposed of. And if we keep doing that, we’ll slowly keep improving.
I advocated for the same thing in healthcare as welfare, actually. You either pay your own or you use the tax-subsidized healthcare but in the latter case, you submit to one-child policy too, at least unless you manage to pay the money back.
Yes. That’s the correct Incentive and policy.