(ESSENTIAL) HOW DOES PROPERTARIANISM ADDRESS (FILL IN THE BLANK) PROBLEM OR PROBLEMATIC/PARASITIC GROUP?
A good (and common category of) question from a reader:
“How does propertarianism address:
The jewish meddling and takeovers of governments through
DEEP STATE METHODS AND TACTICS
The Chemical Industry
PARASITISM FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND BIG BUSINESS AND CORPS perpetrated against the public!?” (Etc etc)
All these enemies would not be able to operate at all in a polity where propertarian rule of law is in place. Any citizen (say, you!) could go into court to stop these people/groups from operating in any non-reciprocal way.
That’s the whole beauty of it. We don’t have to make a long list of enemies and say, “we’ve gotta deal with them, and them, and them, and them, and them…” Instead we just give the people the ability to challenge ANY violation of reciprocity by ANY person or group (including rich people, corporations, foreign-initiated groups, government officials/workers/groups, anybody), in court.
If you’re still asking “but how are you gonna deal with x group or y movement or z lie”, you don’t understand propertarian rule of law. It gives ANY citizen the ability to use the court system to STOP and PUNISH ANY violation of reciprocity and false public speech by ANYONE.
The simple answer to “how are you going to enforce it?” is just to impeach judges who depart from enforcing reciprocity (obviously requires vigilance but not hard – oversight mechanisms with layers, militia and/or monarch as “judge of last resort” – not an “all-powerful monarch rather one with very limited powers – with ultimate responsibility for deciding tough cases).
This constitutional/law solution also solves a major problem for the winning right: we probably don’t have enough time to fully redpill the whole grassroots Right on everything, for example, jooish influence, before ultimate crisis point where we have to coalesce around a solution. Saying “all joos must go!” is gonna be rejected by huge numbers of grassroots rightwingers. The propertarian constitution solves this problem by punishing the parasitic behavior.
When any of our enemies can’t get away with parasitic behavior and are punished for it in court the same way I’d be punished in court if I stole a car or sold a product that killed people, most of them will leave or stay away of their own accord. (Don’t think this is impossible – the reason they’re attracted like flies to exploit our current system is cuz our current system is s**t. They operate where there is opportunity. Propertarian law shuts down the opportunity to be a parasite. Under P law, if you don’t like what, say, a jooish group is doing, something parasitic, you can go sue them and you will win. And if you think the jooish group will win, you don’t understand P law.)
Also, with P law in place, it will be light years easier to redpill people and create a new renaissance by applying the (currently suppressed) science we already have about humanity to the social & political realms. Because our enemies will literally not be able to speak lies about “equality” without losing millions in court. The likes of Curt Doolittle, Kevin MacDonald and Ricardo Duchesne will be household-name heros and Tahesi Coates (or whatever the hell his name is) will be flipping burgers. (Or telling his lies in a blue city-state with his books banned in our polities, IF the Left is lucky enough to still have some land.)
Curt has thought through his stuff folks. People who say “we just need to get rid of the joos!” or some variation of a super-simple solution, never take into account that they would need to SELL that solution to the entire grassroots Right. Which they can’t do. Not nearly as fast as would be needed given how soon we’re gonna need a solution ready to go.
YOU ARE IN CONTACT WITH A GROUP OF PEOPLE (LED BY CURT) WHO THINK THROUGH THINGS VERY, VERY THOROUGHLY.