Mar 21, 2020, 1:38 PM
by John Mark
Frankly, all “intellectual” discourse on the right, outside of P is f***ing embarrassing. The people themselves – those who want to live by and enforce reciprocity – are not embarrassing, just badly taught.
Sounds arrogant to say it, but I’m not bragging on myself, I didn’t come up with it. But even a guy like me can see that a) its explanatory power is well beyond anything else, b) its multi-layered solution is light years beyond anything anyone else has offered, and c) no one else on the right is even offering a solution.
What embarrasses me about most of the supposed intellectual leaders on the Right are that so few of them even bother to recommend a solution and so many are loathe to tell people that war is inevitable. So many of them prefer to just complain about the enemy and redpill people, which is simply not enough.
Any rightwing intellectual that wants to be taken seriously in this crisis in the West needs to tell people war is coming, and then a) say “This is the solution I am recommending for America and the West”, and b) (different way of saying the same thing) write a constitution. Writing law cuts out the B.S. and wishful thinking, and forces a connection with the reality of having to rule human beings. Then we can compare constitutions.
What will happen is all the rightwing constitutions will have a bunch of the same or very similar policies, but only the P constitution will have sufficiently thorough and detailed law strictly constructed from empirical observation and operationalism.