Jan 3, 2020, 12:41 PM
—“How would a society with functioning P-Constitution deal with literature that contains a lot of BS, and claiming it’s just fiction, poetry as an argument to justify the untruths presented and argued in that publication?”—Lauritz Burgunderholm
We prosecute advocacy of criminality today. We have prosecuted it in the past. We had no means of DEMARCATION in the past. Because of P, we have that means of demarcation now, so there is no problem criminalizing advocacy of falsehood and ir-reciprocity no matter the ‘Grammar’ it is written in.
The Law doesn’t say what TO do, and what NOT to do is just what is false or ir-reciprocal. You could write Animal Farm. You couldn’t write the communist manifesto, or pretty much anything postmodern in form.
—“Thank you.”–Lauritz Burgunderholm