All Civilizations Evolve a Group Strategy And Means of Persisting It
All civilizations evolved the following necessary information systems:
(a) a group evolutionary (competitive) strategy,
(b) a mythology to explain and justify it,
(c) wisdom literature to communicate it,
(d) a system of argument to persuade and defend it, and;
(e) institutions to persist it.
|Civilizational Strategy|: Group Strategy > Mythology > ... Wisdom Literature > ... ... System of Argument > Institutions.
(Note: We use “Wisdom Literature” in the more general sense above, rather than the narrower sense of a collection the sayings of sages developed as oral tradition but eventually written down.)
The Evolution of Group Strategies
A Group’s Relationships:
To The Natural World,
To Choices toward Others,
By An Organizational Model,
By Means of Mythology, and Paradigms
By Means of Persuasion and Negotiation,
By Grammar of Communication
The Spectrum of Relationships with The Natural World
– Peers, Ascendants, Transformers, Conquerors of Nature (Europeans)
– In Harmony with Nature – bias mankind (East Asians)
– Interwoven Supernatural and Natural — bias supernatural (Hindu)
– Subjects of the Supernatural (Semitic)
The Spectrum of Choices Toward Others:
– Predation, Parasitism, Rent Seeking, Free Riding, Undermining
– Competition by the degree of Non-imposition, Cooperation, and Trade
– Boycotting Avoidance of conﬂict or cooperation
The Spectrum of Means of Organizing Order and Elites Internally
– Force/Defense: Military/Judiciary — Authority (positive)
– Remuneration/Deprivation: Finance/industry – Markets (exchange)
– Undermining/Inclusion: Priesthood/intellectuals – Resistance (negative)
The Spectrum of Mythologies
– History (truth), Essay, Science
– Literature (analogy), Mythology
– Deceit (fraud), Scripture, Theology
All civilizations produce:
(a) A Group Evolutionary (competitive) Strategy,
(b) A Group Organizing Strategy to Pursue it
(c) A Mythology to explain and justify it,
(d) A Wisdom Literature to communicate it,
(e) A System of Argument to persuade and defend it, and;
(f) A set of Institutions to persist it.
(g) A Set of Traditions, Values, Norms, Habits to Act upon it.
|STRATEGY|Strategy > Organizing Strategy > Mythology > Wisdom Literature > System of Argument > Institutions > Traditions, Values, Norms, Habits > Actions.
Tree of Group Wisdom Literatures
Confucianism, Aristotelianism, Abrahamism, Hinduism->Buddhism
Burial … … Animism …. … … Sun Tzu Realism ( Martial Realism) … … … Confucianism (harmony) … … … … Daoism (Tolerance) … … Proto IE Religion … … … Proto Vedic … … … … Hinduism … … … … Zoroastrianism … … … European Sky Father (martial realism) … … … … European Common Law (legal realism) … … … … … Platonism (idealism) … … … … … … Aristotelianism (realism naturalism) … … Proto Semitic (Animism) … … … Proto Judaism … … … … … Abrahamism <- Zoroastrianism (Authoritarianism) … … … … … … Rabbinical Judaism (Justificationism) … … … … … … Christianity (resistance) … … … … … … … The Augustinian Conflation (compromise) … … … … … … … … Orthodoxy – Catholicism, (settlement) … … … … … … … … … Protestantism, (reformation) … … … … … … … … … … Evangelicalism (folk-religion restoration) … … … … … … … Islam (7th c+) … … … … … … … … Fundamentalist Islam (11-12th c+) … … … … … … … … … Wahabi Fundamentalist Islam (20th c+)
The Geographic Origin of Group Strategies
- FORESTLANDS: Aristocratic Ethics: What will someone not retaliate against even if we agree to it?(rulers/teleological ethics: outcomes) The ethics of warriors who must hold territory. This is a very high-cost strategy because while professional warrior aristocracy is militarily superior, smaller numbers mean threats must be constantly suppressed when small, as soon as identiﬁed. (Proﬁting from the domestication of man)
- BORDERLANDS: Cosmopolitanerish) Ethics: What will someone consent to Regardless of future resentment and retaliation? (borderland/subculture/ deontological ethics: rules) The ethics of diasporic, migrating traders, or herding peoples who can prey upon the locals who hold territory. This is a very low cost (parasitic) ethics that avoids all contribution to the host commons, but requires preserving the ability to exit (migrate). it is the raider strategy by systemic and verbal rather than physical means.
- STEPPELANDS: Russian(0rthodox) Ethics: What can I get away with now by negotiation and subterfuge, and hold by force later? (steppe raiders) The ethics of steppe people surrounded by competitors, always hostile and unpredictable. This is a difﬁcult and expensive but only possible strategy, when one is surrounded by hostile opportunity seekers. While seemingly expansive, it’s actually a fearful one, aggression as the only possible means of controlling defensive positions across open territory.
- FERTILE CRESCENT LAND: (Proﬁt from the subjugation of man) (Cyrus was lost).
- RIVERLANDS: Chinese Ethics: What can I get away with now, but over time make it impossible to change later? The ethics of long term ruling bureaucratic class. Sun Tzu strategy, and Confucian hyper familism. This is an exceptionally cost-effective strategy if one possesses a territorial resource (heartland), and can fortify that heartland. Riverlands strategy defends against Steppland and Desertland strategies. (Proﬁting from the domestication of man)
- DESERTLANDS: Muslim Ethics: (I am still working on this one because I don’t get that it’s causal, but opportunistic.) What can I justify now in order to make this minor advance now? And thereby accumulate wins by wearing down opponents over long periods. The ethics of opportunism. As far as i can tell Islam is just an excuse for justifying opportunism. We can consider this the combination of religion and justifying opportunism – a long term very successful strategy because it’s very low cost.
- HOSTILELANDS: African Ethics (pre-Christian). Africa is akin to the Desertlands because of the sheer number of competitors, the hostility of the disease gradient, the plethora of wildlife, combined with the primitiveness of the available technologies. This is the only possible strategy until one or more core states can evolve, and create sufﬁcient stability in some regions. (this is occurring now).
Grammars of Civilizations Tell Us All We Need to Know
1 – Aristotle Wrote Proto Empiricism: Reason, Naturalism, Proto-empiricism, Law, Calculation. (TRUTH)
2 – Sun Tzu, and Confucius wrote WISDOM LIT. Lao Tzu crossed the line into the questionable. (WISDOM)
3 – The Indians wrote both mythology and wisdom literature, bordering on political science (WISDOM)
4 – The Persians wrote supernormal and supernatural wisdom literature. (UTOPIAN UNIVERSALISM)
5 – The Egyptians wrote RITUALISM Supernatural (Animism, Anthropomorphism, heathenism ) Doctrine and Ritual.
6 – The Abrahamists wrote Mythology, Rebellion, and Lie and Destruction of all of the above. (UTOPIAN LIE)
The Axial Age (Civilization Formation) Anchored Us All
—“Axial Age (also Axis Age, from German: Achsenzeit) is a term coined by German philosopher Karl Jaspers in the sense of a “pivotal age”, characterizing the period of ancient history from about the 8th to the 3rd century BCE. During this period, according to Jaspers’ concept, new ways of thinking appeared in Persia, India, China and the Greco-Roman world in religion and philosophy, in a striking parallel development, without any obvious direct cultural contact between all of the participating Eurasian cultures.”— Wiki
It’s just a fact that the ‘wisdom literature’ of each civilization (a) relies upon the grammar, (b) relies upon the argumentative methodology of the law, (c) relies upon the mythos. It’s inescapable.
There is a reason Jews appropriated Babylonian history, and integrated Greek idealism to create Pilpul (justificationism in theology that relies upon the same techniques as justification in astrology and numerology) … and predictably enough, the same argument you are making (critique – the via-negativa of pilpul’s via-positiva).
There is a reason the Jews appropriated European sciences to create the pseudosciences of Freudianism, boazianism, marxism, neo-marxism, feminism, and HBD-denialism, and European rationalism to create postmodernism, and European math to create with the outliers being Keynes and Foucault – both homosexuals.
Just as there is a reason Confucius couldn’t solve the problem of politics and the Chinese speak in contrasts (riddles).
Just as there is a reason westerners speak in law, evidence, and testimony.
The ‘Axial Age’ anchored us all.
We Dont Know Our Group Strategies
Within each strategy classes develop sub-strategies
We call these ‘metaphysics’ or values as if they are arbitrary – and they aren’t.
European Civilization’s Eugenic, Darwinian, Strategy
- Individualism = Self Determination, by Self Determined Means, Reciprocity, Contract, Oath, Truth, and as a result, legal and political sovereignty. Hence the preservation of oddities like the duel, and trial by combat.
- Trifunctionalism =
- Democratic political structures = Better Said, Markets in Every Aspect of Life. Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Dispute Resolution (court), and Polities.
- Producing Continuous Dynamic Organization and Reorganization. The west and far east can make large organizations. And why the Chinese make better totalitarian bureaucracies and Europeans make better dynamic private organizations. And pretty much everyone else failed.
- Scientific Rationalism = Metallurgical (Technological), Testimony before Jury, military reporting of the facts, unforgiving military epistemology. All of western civilization is a consequence of a military aristocracy, entrepreneurial warfare, access to the franchise in exchange for oath and fighting.
(d) Proﬁt from innovation, adaptation, and productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer (profit from productivity),
(f) Investing assets from organizational formation in production of commons that produce incremental returns. (Profiting from Commons)
(g) Moral and Ethical Markets and Trade: Slowly suppressing criminal, black market, grey market, and open market industries (Profiting from Creating Markets)
(h) Expanding the information system (Profiting from Creating Open Knowledge)
(i) Expanding the state, the law, knowledge, traditions, their culture, institutions, and norms in order to increase the size of markets (Epand Economic Cohesion).
(j) Expanding the market by conquest (profiting from Conquest)
The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions:
(a) A Minority, Aristocracy, Beset by Adversity That Together They Overcome (conquer)
(b) Preservation of Competitive Advantage and Numbers (Aristocratic-Best, Egalitarianism-Openness, Market Meritocracy)
(c) Payment for the cost of the commons (manners, ethics, morals, traditions, institutions, common property); (Profit from Funding Normative Commons)
(e) Specializing, because of dynamic military tactics, in dynamic organization formation and adaptation and low corruption (Profiting from Military, State, Institution, Industry, business, civil, civic formation)
… Self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; including association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, information, elites, and polities
… the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible,
… advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses,
… allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.
Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.
Western civilization’s strategy consists of profiting from discovery of, adaptation to, application of, mastery of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, to continuously transform man into gods, and nature, and the universe, into heavens. In simple terms, this has meant the historical conquest and incremental domestication of others, while we race to stay ahead of our works.
And it is a profitable enterprise. It’s also incompatible with universal democracy. It appears to be incompatible with republicanism. It appears only to be compatible with a constitutional monarchy, and houses for the classes limited to approval or rejection of requests for revenue (taxation). We had it about right in Great Britain and in Europe before the french revolution. We should have left it that way. And not because of some sentimental reasons, but because the combination of a monarch as a judge of last resort, a via-Positiva professional cabinet, houses that act as juries on initiatives, and the people’s standing in court to prosecute individuals and groups both private and public, it’s the optimum method of calculating policy on one hand, limiting it on the other, and squeezing the politicians, bureaucracy, and commercial sectors between the monarchy by authority and the people by the courts and vote.
The Great Contradiction Enlightenment Contradictions
( democracy ) ( end of agrearian eugenic pressures ) (profitability of expanding underclass and immigratns) (the momentum of commerce not regulated by cost to normative, cultural, institutional, and genetic capital)
The Abrahamic Dark Age
However, the Abrahamic dark ages cost mankind 1500 years of Jewish, Christian, and Muslim expansion, a billion dead, the Jewish and Christian undermining of the European world, and the muslim destruction and reduction to ashes of every great civilization of the ancient world, and a century of bloodshed by marxism, communism, bolshevism, and now Neo-marxism, postmodernism, political correctness, and denial of human differences and needs.
What is Aristotelianism (Europeanism)?
The primacy of actions, the primacy of life (living), the primacy of achievement(excellence), the primacy of heroic achievement under adversarialism (adversity), the primacy of man (over nature, gods), the primacy of the transcendence of man into godhood, the primacy of reality, and realism(material persistence), of naturalism (universe consists of natural material, understandable causes), of materialism (mind is just matter-in-motion), and operationalism (we test our thoughts by our actions), and of human beings, and their responsibility for their actions. This strategy gave Europeans a particular ‘sensibility’ which is correspondents with reality, and sensitivity to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and the subsequent discovery, adaptation to, and application of, physical laws, natural laws of cooperation, and evolutionary laws of transcendence and eugenics and to prevent regression to the mean: together, the civilizational production of human agency over the universe by the incremental domestication of man, nature, and reality: to leave the world better for having lived in it.
We call it Aristotelianism, or Science, or Empiricism, or Testimony, Prosecution, and Defense before the court, or the long tradition of military epistemology contained in the simple act of military ‘reporting’ – just the facts. The most intolerant epistemology known to man: warfare – wherein the highest correspondence with reality and the total exhaustion of unknowns, produces the greatest chance of survival.
And only a universal militia – a voluntary army of every single man woman and child, dependent upon technology, strategy (contract), holding (duty,), maneuver (adaptation), seizing initiative (innovation), and just distribution of returns, would develop that exhaustive military, technical, procedural, sensibility, and drive it down throughout the entire population, creating the extraordinary trust between warriors as the normative trust in the polity, thus preparing the people for commons, and preparing the population for commerce and trade, their fitness for service in the thang, jury and senate, and their continuous adaptation to every opportunity presented in the world.
This technique of holding court on all events, claims, theories and ‘prosecuting every assumption, every unknown, regardless of cost or outcome’ is the strange, costly sensibility of western civilization. And our sensibility is to choose the most costly, to question every presumption, to falsify every dependency, and to ask the last question, is in itself the continuous court of prosecution of the human mind, emotion, instinct, perception, and sense. The result is the continuous progress toward an understanding of, control of, and improvement of, ourselves, nature, and the universe in a single, universally commensurable language we call the sciences.
Testimony consists of speech that will survive the court of the imagination, knowledge, memory, mind, emotion, perception, sense; survive the court of realism, naturalism, and operationalism; survive the court of reciprocity, sovereignty, self-determination, self-determined means; and demand for warranty or punishment for perjury. Please see my complete test of truth here: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2019/02/23/on-truth-complete-core/
Western civilization makes use of “Testimony”. Limiting one’s display word and deed to non-interference in Self Determination, by Self-Determined means, by mutual insurance of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Testimony by the Testifiable, and Warrantable, and Liable.
This is the most expensive intolerant limit on human behavior we have developed yet it promotes experimentation and licenses anything that maintains others’ self-determination by self-determined means, and sovereigty.
So the scientific method, like that method of prosecution in court, is merely whatever is necessary to limit one’s speech to the facts that are warrantable, and within the limits of liability – meaning restitutability – and licensing punishment of you for violation of those limits.
- The Universal Army and Military Society where all are warriors first, craftsmen(industry) second, family third.
- The Gain of Self Determination, by Self Determined means, for service in that military (society)
- The Necessity of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Markets in Everything that result from universal self-determination.
- The Deep Requirement for all to Do One’s Duty in defense of the Commons (responsible for everything).
- The Demand for “Reporting”, Thang, Jury, Court “Testimony”, and Testimony in all walks of life under Reciprocity.
- The Costly Commons of Reciprocity in display, word (testimony), and deed.
- The Oath to “Neither Lie, Cheat, Steal, or show Cowardice in Battle”
WHERE TESTIMONIAL SPEECH IS CONSISTS OF:
- Complete Sentences
- In promissory form
- In testimonial form
- In operational vocabulary (as actions)
- absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)
- including all changes in state
- including all consequences of change in state
- from an observer’s point of view
- producing a series of testable transactions.
WHERE THE CRITERIA FOR TRUTHFUL SPEECH IS:
Coherence Across the Dimensions Testifiable by Man, in The Series:
- Existential >
… 2. Realism >
… 3. Naturalism >
- Possible >
… 5. Operational – Demonstrable >
… 6. Empirical – Externally Correspondent >
… 7. Logical – Categorically Consistent
- Rational >
… 9. Rational Choice – Demonstrated Preference >
… … 10. Incentives – Demonstrated Interest >
… … … 11. Body, Mind, Memory, Effort, Time
… … … 12. Mates, Offspring, Kin
… … … 13. Status, Reputation, Kith
… … … 14. Several Interests (in many forms)
… … … 15. Common Interests (in many forms)
… 16. Reciprocal >
… … 17. Productive
… … 18. Fully Informed
… … 19. Voluntary Transfer >
… … 20. Free of Negative Externality >
- Survivable >
… 22. Power Distribution of Law >
… 23. Pareto Distribution of Assets >
… 24. Nash Distribution of Rewards >
- Complete >
… 26. Limits, Completeness, Full Accounting, (Exhaustive)
… 27. Consistency, Coherence, Parsimony (Exhaustive)
- Competitive – in the market for theories
… 29. Sufficient – Satisfies the Demand For Infallibility
… 30. Parsimony – In competition with other testimonies
- Warrantable >
… 32. (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions;
… 33. (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility;
… 34. (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.
AS A DEFENSE AGAINST THE SERIES:
- Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;
- Error and failure of Due Diligence;
- Bias and Wishful Thinking;
- And the many Deceits of:
… (a) Loading and Framing;
… (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and
… (c) Overloading, Propaganda and Social Construction
… (d) Fictionalisms of
… … i) Idealism -> Pseudorationalism, and
… … ii) Magic -> Pseudoscience, and
… … iii) Occult -> Supernaturalism;
… (e) Sophistry
… (f) and outright Fabrications (fictions).
IN PURSUIT OF THE SERIES:
… (a) murder,
… (b) harm, damage, theft,
… (c) fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection, baiting into hazard
… (d) unearned gains, unproductive gains, blackmail
… (e) free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons,
… (f) rent-seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism,
… (g) conversion(religion/pseudoscience),
… (h) displacement(immigration/overbreeding),
… (i) conquest (war).
IN DEFENSE OR ADVOCACY OF:
Any transfer of demonstrated interests that is not reciprocal, the tests of:
… (a) productive
… (b) fully informed, fully accounted
… (d) voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests
… (e) free of externality of the same criteria
… (c) warrantied and within the limits of liability
In the Context Of The Ternary Logic of Cooperation, Violence is Never Off The Table
As conscious beings possessed of different degrees of agency, we consciously grasp, or unconsciously presume, five questions upon which all others depend:
- The first question is: “Why not commit suicide?” This choice is that of Personal philosophy.
- The second question is: “Why engage in cooperation rather than free-riding, parasitism, and predation?” This question is that of Ethics.
- The third question – and one that a group must answer – is: “Why engage in cooperation with others, rather than free-riding, parasitism, and predation?” This question is that of Politics.
- The Fourth Question a group must answer is: “How shall we organize our people with myths, arguments, and rules to survive and prosper in competition from nature and man?” That the question of Group Evolutionary Strategy,
- The Fifth Question a group must answer is “What are the limits of tolerance for life, for ethics, for politics, and for group evolutionary strategy, before we resort to suicide, separation, free riding, parasitism, predation, and the condition of victimhood?” That is the Question of Limits.
The answer to all five questions is that persistence of the opportunities of existence, of the returns on cooperation, and of the returns on the production of commons, are preferable to suicide, separation, free-riding, parasitism, predation, and the condition of victimhood. Conversely, resistance, violence, feud, insurrection, revolution, civil war, warfare, and genocide are preferable to submission to undermining of cooperation, hindering of cooperation, parasitism, and predation.
The Strength and Weakness of Gentlemanly Argument With The Enemy
We are indoctrinated into the colloquial yet often undefinable use of truth, but not that we must meet tests of sufficient infallibility to claim we speak truthfully. We have vast numbers of people, and perhaps the vast majority of women, that, by stating ‘true for me’, cannot distinguish between useful, preferable, and excusable, versus true regardless of utility or whether we prefer it, and whether a statement is warrantable. We have just as many people, and the majority of women, who We are confused by the difference between honesty, truthfulness (due diligence), ideal truth, and tautological truth. We are taught the logic of inference where statements are either true or false. But statements in and of themselves are undecidable, possibly true, or certainly false. Likewise, we are indoctrinated into the norm of cooperating or not cooperating. But our choice is cooperating, not cooperating, or conflict.
The problems with our presumption in the victorian debate, when we should be using prosecution. The premise of always bearing arms, lost to us.
If the opposition will not engage in truthful reciprocal negotiation on an exchange that achieves mutually beneficial ends, then the only solution to the conflict is violence. And the western man has lost his will to use aggressive, thorough, and relentless violence against parasitism, undermining, and instigation of discontent by false promise.
The Necessity of Violence: “Every Man a, a soldier, a sheriff, a shareholder.”
Violence is never off the table. It is licensed the moment we encounter every violation of reciprocity. The reason we tolerate it from our females is in our division of labor, they bear the primary cost of reproduction, child-rearing, and community care, and in exchange, they generate demand without generating solutions, and they generate demand. This is not rational, but pre-civilizational and intuitive (instinctual).
But we are easily made victims of suggestion by the enemy when the enemy uses the same technique as our women.
Caretaking vs Parasitism vs Undermining
( … The difference between Christian-Liberal care and Jewish-Marxist-Pomo undermining. … )
The War Against European Sense, Civilization, and People
It is the incremental undermining of Testimony, Reciprocity, Sovereignty, Self Determination, by Self Determined means, from all walks of life by saturating the environment with incentives to circumvent it, that has brought us to the brink of a new dark age of ignorance, superstition, pseudoscience, sophistry and in particular, the myth that western man oppressed rather than evolved mankind – kicking and screaming against its will – because the high cost of western sense-making, and its application, is more than less developed people can bear.
What is Abrahamism?
In our Glossary of Natural Law “Abrahamism” refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (via-positiva), and Critique (via-negativa) to construct sophisms (the argumentative equivalent of numerology and astrology) via use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, the Fictionalisms, appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards.
All three Abrahamic Religions, Kantian philosophy, Marxist argument, and Postmodern thought all make use of this technique of argument, often stated as “Dialectic” but operationally consisting of Social Construction via Overloading of human reason with False Promise advanced by Pilpul (sophistry) and defended by Critique (undermining and disapproval rather than falsification).
Most of Propertarianism (the Natural Law of Reciprocity, The Law of Testimony) consists of attempts to prevent Abrahamic arguments and replace them with Testimonial (Ratio-Scientific-and-Operational) arguments so that Law (Constitutions) can be constructed strictly and logically and is not open to accidental, intentional, misinterpretation. Thus requiring legislatures reform a law rather than allow legislation from the Jurist’s bench – which is the means by which the US Constitution was undermined.
Propertarianism includes Testimonialism, the purpose of which is the suppression of deception and parasitism by rhetorical means.
Abrahamism: consists of Baiting into Hazard, False Promise, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw manning, and heaping of undue praise, and propagation into social construction, to force you by overloading to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence.
The Semitic Group Strategy
The Semitic group strategy shares the preservation f family and tribe against the empires and aristocracy. But to decompose it it we must be divided into the Muslim and the Jewish, with the Christian a distant relation.
For the moment I’ll address the Jewish strategy, and describe the Muslim in a later article.
(a) Preservation of separatism (non-integration) (Tribalism)
(b) Evasion of payment for the cost of the commons (manners, ethics, morals, traditions, institutions, common property) (Free Riding);
(c) Proﬁt from baiting into hazard (usury, alcohol, prostitution, slave trading, gambling, organized crime); (Parasitism)
(d) Proﬁting from (Undermining)
(e) Specializing in use of the state against the people (tax collection, money changing)(Corruption)
(f) Investing assets from these criminal activities into rent-seeking (non productive parasitic returns) (Rent Seeking);
(g) Undermining Moral and Ethical Markets and Trade: Slowly migrating capital into mixed criminal, black market, grey market, and open market industries (Undermining Markets)
(h) Undermining the information system (Propaganda)
(i) Undermining the state, the law, their knowledge, their traditions, their culture, the institutions, and their norms in order to convert the state from suppression of local rents to maximization of rents (Undermining Political Cohesion).
- Female Strategy:
- Natural: Supremacy,
Others: Parasitism – particularly on commons
Myth: Deceit (Fictional History)
Negotiation: Deception (Baiting Into Hazard)
Grammar: Inflationary (Fictionalisms)
- For the same reasons females feel they are superior to males, Jews feel they are superior to indo europeans.
- Natural: Supremacy,
Common Properties of Abrahamism
- 1) Restatement of Myth as History
- 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law
- 3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”)
- 4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance.
- a) Authoritarian (blind to questioning)
- b) Demand for Aubmission (blind to innovation)
- c) Intolerance for Change or adaptation (blind dedication)
- d) Blindness to negative Results or Evidence, Overstatement of Positive results (blind faith)
- 5) False Promise of Impossible (supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance.
- 6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods.
- 7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods.
- 8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge.
- 9) Costs of Entry:
- Oath to a falsehood. (prayer)
- Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. (rituals)
- Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood (tithes)
The Abrahamic Method of Civilizational Destruction
Judaism -> Undermining, Christianity-> Submitting, Islam -> Conquering
… because analysis of any SINGLE sub-religion obscures the function of the group of abrahamic religions as a force of destruction.
Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to destroy.
Because those are the three stages of Abrahamism’s method of conquest of the aristocratic peoples by conversion and conquest of women and underclasses (those yet not ‘domesticated into agency’).
Stage 1 – Small external population (vanguard) undermines the main by straw man criticism and ridicule of the organization and its categories relations and values The purpose of Judaism is subjugation (submission). (Judaism – GOSSIP: Reputation Destruction)
Stage 2 – The population is undermined into submission by sale of a false promise – the verbal equivalent of a physical drug. The purpose of Christianity is subjugation (submission). (Christianity – FRAUD: Selling a false promise ).
Stage 3 – The major external population conquers the submitted through raiding the trade routes, immigration, conversion, and conquest and population replacement. The purpose of Islam is subjugation (submission). (Islam – FORCE).
The consequence is the reversal of civilization of the hierarchical pack and the restoration of primitivism of the equalitarian herd. Producing a genetic, cultural, and institutional race to the bottom.
Abrahamic grammars of pilpul and critique are simply well-constructed lies that through repeated use produce an addiction response, the same way that membership in (submission to) the pack or tribe produces an addiction response.
It’s a brilliant hack really.
Evil as hell.
Only the west sub-Saharan Africa, and the Far East were able to resist the regression due to rates of underclass reproduction and raiding on aristocracy (Judaism), culture (Christianity), population and economy (Islam).
Understand the ancient enemy of mankind.
Fear of being Left Behind > False Promise > Sophistry > Critique > Pilpul > Supernatural.
Women are the most vulnerable because they evolved to be irrationally dependent upon the ‘cover’ of the herd. The underclass as well. the less capable classes out of utility. The middle class out of profit from it, and the upper class replaced by a priesthood (frauds) rather than a military (science).
It Is a Very Simple Process Once Understood.
Understand the Enemy’s Genetic and Non-Rational Way of War
The Laws of Nature, and the Natural Law and the Organized application of science, law, and violence to force correspondence with them, in order to complete the transformation of man in to the immortal gods mastering nature that he imagined.
LAW OF WAR: You must fight wars on your terms, not the enemy’s but you must defeat the enemy on his terms not yours.
Common Tactics in Abrahamism
Civilizational Destruction from Within;
Instigating Construction of Internal Spirals of Capital Rivalry, Consumption, Destruction;
By Baiting into Hazard (certain risk);
Those who are ignorant, or lack agency;
By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality);
Under the persuasion by Sophism (pilpul);
Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw—manning)
Under the cover of Moral Pretense (lie);
Under the cover of Plausible Deniability (lie);
For the purpose of profiting (by harm)
From the consumption of accumulated capital (undermining): truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes,
By not specializing in,
… The production of innovation in goods services information, both private and common
Where one’s display word and deed is Warrantied
And instead by specialization in fields permitting Export of Risk And Absent Warranty
… Gossip for Undermining (Entertainment, Media, News, Opinion)
… Informational Destruction (Academy)
… Government (Facilitation of Conflict)
… … (Undermining by,
… … … Facilitation of Conflict,
… … … Facilitating Dissolution of norms, traditions, manners, ethics morals,
… … … Facilitation of Parasitism, Capital exhaustion)
… Rent—Seeking (special interests)
… Corruption (influence)
… Undermining the law (specialization in undermining the constitution via the courts)
… Law (specialization in coercion)
… Finance (Parasitism and entrapment)
… Tax and accounting (evasion)
… Marketing and Advertising (scams and undermining)
… Sales Scams
… Commercial Trade in Scams physical, service, and informational
… Black Market Goods, services, and Information.
… Check Cashing
… Loan Sharking
… Drug Dealing
… creating conflict,
… destroying trust,
… generating demand for restitution
… generating demand for authority,
And authority that recursively issues another iteration of
… false promise,
… baiting into hazard
Causing a Continuous Conflict Spiral
And Tragedy of the Commons (Conflict for consumption)
until all accumulated assets, including:
… institutional and
have been consumed;
by the conflict between classes and interests;
and by the expansion of the underclasses;
whose numbers, invasion, reproduction, consumption, agitation, had been previously limited by;
… productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy;
… And the surplus proceeds from production devoted to the production of commons;
… Providing the asymmetric returns on those commons.
And Using Abrahamism
Where Abrahamism (noun) Consists of:
- Stating or Implying a False Promise, (of escape from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws)
- Without provision of Warranty, (skin in the game)
- For the purpose of Baiting into Moral Hazard, (failure)
- Where one can profit from others’ loss, by
- Free Riding,
- Socialization of Losses,
- Privatization of The Commons,
- Persuaded or Argued by “Pilpul” consisting of the
- Sophisms of:
- Conflation (!!)
- False Dichotomy
- False Equivalency
- Double Standards
- Cherry Picking
- and the Fictionslisms of:
- Supernaturalism, and
- Sophisms of:
- Appealing to:
- NAXALT (‘not all x are like that’)
- Optimisms or Pessimisms as Medians (outliers)
- Reasonableness (limiting to interpersonal)
- Morality (limiting to global)
- Face (Status, Reputation, Honor)
- Norms (what others do)
- Authority (scripture, law)
- Instead of:
- Truth or Falsehood
- Rationality vs Irrationality (self interest)
- Reciprocity or Irreciprocity
- Probability or Improbability
- Possibility or Impossibility
- And defended by “Critique”, consisting of:
- Heaping of Undue Praise on Straw Men (positive)
- Criticism by Straw Manning (negative), and
- Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
- and GSRRM (denial, disapproval, ridicule, shaming, reputation destruction), consisting of:
- reputation Destruction
- and reputation destruction –
- distraction, and
- Instead of:
- True of False argument,
- Or Fully Informed Agreement or Disagreement
- Advancing a falsehood on one hand, and
- Attacking the person rather than argument on the other.
- In order to obscure:
- stealing, to directly lie, cheat, steal, or
- baiting into hazards from which they can
- lie cheat and steal under cover of
- ambiguity and
- pretense of ignorance, and
- pretense of innocence for the harm done.
- lie cheat and steal under cover of
Ridicule, Shaming, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Gossiping, Rallying, Sophism, Pilpul, Critique, Pseudoscience, Supernaturalism, Relativism, Straw-Manning, Misrepresentation, Cherry-Picking, Double-Standards, Half-Truth, False Equivalency, False And Impossible Promise, Moral Pretense, Escape From Warranty, Baiting Into Hazard, Proﬁting From Resulting Hardship, Nepotism, Privatization Of The Commons, Socialization Of Losses, Conspiracy, Organized-Crime, Rent-Seeking, Procedural-Abuse, False Accusation, Institutional Overloading, Intellectual Dishonesty, Coercion, Endemic Lying, Shouting Down, Propagandizing, Poisoning The Discourse, Polluting The Informational Commons, Traitorousness, And Personal, Social, Political, Cultural, Religious, Aesthetic, Legal, Constitutional, And Institutional Undermining, Thanklessness, Evading Introspection, Blame-Shifting, Avoidance Of Responsibility, And Cowering Under Plausible Deniability In Order To Avoid Any Semblance Of Truth, Reciprocity, Productivity, Duty, And Contribution To The Commons.
- And scaling from the individual to the polity to the society to the civilization by Social Construction using:
- Pseudo-Academic Publication
- Biased Reporting
Now, notice how simple the truth is, and how complex the lies are.
Baiting Into Hazard (Seduction)
“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (proﬁt), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conﬂict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”
That paragraph may require multiple reads, so that you follow the full sequence. It explains the genetic conﬂict strategy of females who must manage children by half-truths, compete and cooperate with other women by half-truths, and inﬂuence or undermine the dominance hierarchy of men with half-truths, using the suite of disapproval, ridicule, shaming, scolding, psychologizing, moralizing, gossiping, rallying, and if necessary psychotic episodes (female version of anti-social behavior) to obtain her interests — because she cannot otherwise compete by production, trade, knowledge, argument, or violence.
The Abrahamic < Jewish < Semitic < Cognitively-Female technique of undermining host civilizations, nations, groups, hierarchies, families, and individuals. Seduction by false promise of freedom from truth, duty, reciprocity, productivity, and the laws of nature, into hazard and harm, for proﬁting by parasitic extraction.
Evolution provided women with verbal means of warfare just like it provided men with physical means of warfare. And in all statistics both criminal and mental illness, and in all forms of political speech, and even in all forms of argument and discourse, men bias to truth and falsehood under physical threat, and women bias to approval and disapproval under threat of undermining.
Men are Political and Military super predators but Women are Social and Political super predators. This is the reason for women’s disenfranchisement from political participation in history, and the reason for women‘s historical reputation as the root of all evil “discord”.
Europeans are male superpredators, and Jews are female superpredators, with the only difference being that Europeans dominated the production of beneﬁcial rewards for mankind, and jews and Arabs dominated the production of harms to mankind.
Abrahamism is the same technique used to bring about the ﬁrst Semitic Dark Age — this time of Pseudoscience (including economic innumeracy) and Sophism in the forms of Jewish Marxism to instigate conﬂcit between the classes, Jewish Postmodernism cause conﬂict by undermining conformity to high trust norms, Jewish Denialism that we call Political Correctness to deny the truth, all under the false promise that equality — ever desirous of the female given her demand for consumption — is possible. When the entire point of Jewish cosmopolitan universalism in this age, like Jewish supernatural
The Technique of Dialectic
( … )
The Technique of Pilpul
Their technique of Pilpul: They use an element of truth to create a false dichotomy and therefore frame the question by suggestion, and obscure the solution due to anchoring.
- We are always vulnerable to anchoring.
- Because we are vulnerable to anchoring we are vulnerable to framing.
- Because we are vulnerable to framing we are vulnerable to suggestion and obscurantism.
- Because we are vulnerable to suggestion and obscurantism we are vulnerable to influence.
If we are provided with an incentive to justify that influence we can be controlled – by Blocking our Opportunity and Motivation for seeking truth.
The three Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) all produce recursive ignorance due to BLOCKING our search for truth.
This is how PILPUL is used to deceive, and why math, logic, science, economics, law and testimonial truth are such an important defense.
A lie (incentive), a half truth, a False dichotomy (choice).
Low trust people simply don’t go beyond the tangible. High trust people do. Our asset of high trust in constructing the commons which produce such outsized returns compared to other peoples. But our trust( suspension of disbelief), and vulnerability to anchoring, suggestion, and obscurantism make our ordinary folk easily deceived, manipulated, controlled, and preyed upon.
Now, with that understanding, let’s define the properties of Critique.
- Opportunity to obtain an unearned discount by avoiding a cost, causing others to bear a cost, lie, cheat, steal, undermine, or defeat.
- Decidability – in the choice between the via positiva: self sufficiency, reciprocity, and via-negativa: parasitism, and cheating a preference for
- Criticism of the status quo, current leadership, current plan, current strategy, norms, traditions, institutions.
- Conflation of Approval, Preference, and Desirability with Truth, Necessity, and Possibility.
- Special Pleading, Irreciprocal or Polylogical Ethics, False Moral Equivalence
- Liability warranty
- Plausible Deniability
- Feminine demand from Males to insulate females, the young, and the old, and the weak from physical, natural, evolutionary, laws of the universe, by social construction of instability that threatens the dominant males.
- Anthropomorpization: Blaming the dominance hierarchy as a proxy for the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. (Blaming the police so to speak).
- Absence of Solution, Statement of Demand, because stating the demand would cause retaliation, or be otherwise untenable. Why? Because solutions or alternatives are open to equal rational criticism. Instead, absence of a solution, substituting criticism causes the opposition to defend against ideal demands rather than comparative trade-offs. The appropriate counter is to ask for an equally articulate plan, how to bring it into being, and what the consequences would be.
- Selling Cope via Hope as a Delaying (Undermining) Technique.
- False Promise: Freedom from the conformity to the ‘oppression of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws’. Freedom from scarcity, freedom from reciprocity, freedom from suppression of dysgenia.
- Selling Frauding: Advanced by Pilpul: using the three possible means of human defrauding: Physical: magic > pseudoscience, verbal: sophistry > idealism, or imaginary(emotional): supernatural > occult.
- Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)
… … (M)oralizing,
… … … (P)sychologizing,
… … … … (R)idiculing
… … … … … (R)allying
… … … … … … (G)ossiping
… … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing
… … … … … … … … (U)ndermining,
… … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction.
… … and solving for…
… … … … … … … … … … (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of truth.
In western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.
GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.
- Straw Manning – painting a false or cherry-picked set of claims to undermine. My pet peeve is economists who ignore losses in civilizational, Institutional, cultural, normative, informational, cognitive, and human, capital.
- Personalizing an idea, and attacking the person, versus heaping of undue praise to exaggerate a person. —“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.”– Saul Alinsky
- Overloading: by use of Dialectic(using narration, suggestion, suspension of disbelief, recursive undermining, for recursive suggestion, recursively reducing resistance to skepticism, and providing reinforcement by appeal to instinct.)
- Environmental Overloading (propaganda) –
- Social Construction of Threats: by use of continuous gossiping about the subject at every opportunity so that those who are less able and informed are convinced by environmental saturation (Norm).
All Critique Is “Lying” – and Here Is Why
1 – Either we are engaged in
… … productive,
… … fully informed(truthful),
… … warrantied (skin in the game),
… … voluntary transfers (exchanges),
… … free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated investments of others by externality,
… … limited to our ability to perform restitution (reversal),
.. or we are not.
2 – Every forced transfer is a lost opportunity for exchange – even if an exchange of good, for norm (behavior).
3 – In other words, all demands for goods independent of exchange are simply use of threats of disassociation (boycott) as a means of extraction (rent seeking).
Critique is simply the technology invented in the Levant for the purpose of ‘selling’ the monotheisms to the underclasses as a revolt against the great civilizations of the ancient world – but this time in pseudo-scientific (Ashkenazi Marxist) and pseudo-rational (French post modern) prose.
Compare Critique To Argument
( … )
History of Abrahamism
Origins of Abrahamism: The Gender Differences in Negotiating
The Genders differ in their competition, conflict and warfare strategy.
Males: Truth under threat of violence in the service of male solidarity in the preservation of the Tribe and Territory is the competitive strategy of males. Males fight for position in the hierarchy and end conflict with increases in loyalty to one another.
— vs —
Females: conformity under threat of reputation destruction in the service of female solidarity independent of Tribe and Territory is the competitive strategy of females. Females fight to destroy or kill without ending.
Abrahamism consists of the continuous advancement of the female means of conflict and war: undermining, deceit, and exhaustive relentless diligence in seizing every opportunity to do so. It is the ‘gatherer’ and ‘herd’ strategy of continuous harm. Men tend not to do this, in-group. Instead men use threats of violence and organized violence.
What I do, what we Propertarians do, is teach how to identify, understand, and defeat these feminine arguments – arguments that because of our high trust genetics, traditions, institutions, and civilization, we are disproportionately vulnerable to.
The Evolution of The Art of Lying:
- The Female Group Strategy of Undermining
- Abrahamism v1: Judaism against Babylon’s Aristocracy
- Abrahamism v2: Christianity against Western Aristocracy.
- Abrahamism v3: Islam against the ancient world’s Aristocracy
- Abrahamism v4: Marxism against the modern world’s Aristocracy.
- Abrahamism v5: French Postmodernism against the current world’s Aristocracy.
- Abrahamism v6: Islamism against the entire world’s Aristocracy.
This is why the abrahamic (Jewish in particular, or Semitic in general) means of countering Greco-Roman-European argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with Semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with European reason science truth testimony.
- Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost.
- Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth.
- Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth.
Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘Western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest.
Hence why Christians are the vulnerability of Western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism.
The Middle East uses the female reproductive strategy and the Far East and the West use the male reproductive strategy, with the Far East using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the West using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the Middle East today just as in the age of the Greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end.
The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so.
Abrahamism, Communism, Postmodernism vs Technology, Markets, and Truth.
We see the evolution of law of western peoples:
1 – Sovereignty, (individualism is incorrect).
2 – Tort, and thang, court, senate,
3 – Martial Truth (Military ‘Reporting’), and the demand for speaking martial truth regardless of the consequences to the dominance (competency) hierarchy.
4 – Reason, rationalism, empiricism, and science as a consequence.
5 – Markets and competing intellectual disciplines rather than authority and mono-disciplines (ie: religion).
These choices are the consequences of mixed, metalworking, agrarian, cattle herders, requiring large well defended territories, that must self finance their military capability, because they lack any means of concentrating capital and taxation cheaply as did the irrigationist in the flood river valleys. They developed ‘Contractual Civilization’.
But we also see:
1 – Abrahamic fiction and supernaturalism of the pastoralists against the reason and realism of the agrarians and metallurgists;
2 – Pseudoscientific Communism as a restatement of Jewish separatism using class warfare; and;
3 – Postmodernism as a pseudo-rational restatement of Marxism-communism using ethnic warfare.
1 – Superstition (Judaism, Christianity, Islamism)
…. evolved into ==>
2 – pseudoscience (w Jewish Critique)
… evolved into ==>
3 – pseudo rationalism (w Jewish Pilpul) (French > German > Jewish),
… evolved into ==>
3 – denialism and silencing (w Jewish Bolshevism)
Each time increasing in rhetorical complexity but using the same techniques in each of the sophisms:
1 – Justification (Pilpul) and Poisoning the Well by Straw Man (Critique) then adding incremental techniques of:
… a) Fictionalism (Fictional History > Mythology),
… b) Supernaturalism,
… c) Pseudoscience, and;
… d) Pseudo Rationalism, and at present
… e) Simple Denialism. (Race, IQ, Homogeneity, Markets)
LYING BY SUGGESTION
It took me less than a year of relatively hard work to disassemble the techniques into grammars and enumerate and articulate all of them. But no matter the depth of analysis, lying by art of suggestion by overloading is still lying by abuse of the human process of continuous recursion in streams of memory producing what we call Meaning, and our suggestibility and suspension of disbelief in that state.
DEFENSE AGAINST FALSEHOOD
Realism, Reason, Calculation and Computation in all their forms, are defenses against this suggestion, loading, overloading by the use of correspondence and operational possibility, but take disciplined training and a minimum intellectual ability. Because we have a host of cognitive and moral (reproductive) biases that influence our choices without the discipline and training to prevent them from doing so.
RULES OF ORDER
The Ancient World civilizations each produced means of producing sufficient meaning (rules) for local preservation of cooperation:
Rome (Realism), Athens (Idealism(abstract)), Anatolian (lost), Babylon (Ideal Monotheism(supernatural)), Jerusalem (Authoritarian Reactionary Monotheism), Beka Valley (Authoritarian Expansionary Monotheism), Memphis (Pragmatic Ritual Polytheism), Indus (Pragmatic Narrative Polytheism), and Yellow River (Confucian Rationalism, hierarchy and harmony), Lao Tsu’s “balance and reasonableness”, and the utility of Buddhism in Ritual. With only the Japanese
The Great Conflict of Human History
The homogeneous masculine eugenic pack of hunters and farmers were able to produce high trust commons, versus the heterogeneous feminine dysgenic universalist herd and herders were unable to produce high trust commons. (Cain and Able is the literary example of the Pastoralists hatred of the wealthier and urbanized Agrarians and Metalworkers).
But the question is not Athens vs Jerusalem, since both ideal democracy and supernatural universalism have been the greatest failures of all of the world civilizations, causing the destruction of every great ancient civilization and bringing about the Abrahamic Dark Age and it’s 750M dead; as well as the current 150 Year attempt at recreating another Abrahamic Dark Age — this time by Rousseau, Kant, Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno and co., and their 100M dead. Followed by the inventiveness of the French and their conspirators: Derrida, Foucault, Rorty et al. And the feminists that followed from them: each trying to produce a monopoly as a means of avoiding markets for cooperation, because they are unable to compete in those markets for pareto optimums, only Nash equilibriums
In the ancient world, overextension of the empires to eliminate local frictions (taxes, rents) on trade, and profit from those efficiencies, produced travel, communication, trade, and infrastructure that made possible the Jewish and Christian invasion of the western empire; intentional fomenting of underclass resistance against the aristocratic civilization; and then Byzantine forcible conversion of the entirety of the population in order to end Reason, Law, and Aristocratic Rule.
The same technique is being used in this current era: invade, rebel, rally underclasses, import underclasses, and then seek power by numbers, using fairy tales desirable by those underclasses using the sophisms those underclasses are defenseless against, and which the Aristocracy tolerates or finds useful until the society has been destroyed by it.
Gobekli Tepe is the oldest Temple complex we find to date, and predates all other monolithic works by thousands of years. It is also just south of one of the world’s greatest hunting gardens teeming with life at the origin of the Euphrates – an Eden if there ever was one.
As far as we know, from there, at the nexus of the continents, near the center of trade between them, on the highways of the main rivers, the idea spread from the monoliths of the Atlantic peoples to the advanced stone of the Egyptians.
It was an early and effective tool of social order. Most likely because it predicted seasons. Once those skills existed, the construction revolution bloomed.
The West that The Rest Rebels Against
While Myth, Ritual, and Oath are necessary components of demand for neural economy (computational efficiency) in the production of rules of social order, how we communicate those rules, the group evolutionary strategies in those rules, and the outcomes that are produced as externality by those rules, are not only means of internal persistence, but external competition. Only one set of those rules produces reciprocally beneficial outcomes:
Western Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, Sovereignty, Reason, Science, Rule of Law, and Competitive Markets in Everything gave the world nearly everything that raised man out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the dangers of nature.
Western Civilization consists of The Continuous Calculation by Competitive Trial and Error, of our Ascent into the Gods we imagine. Western civilization was and until recently, was organized to continuously produce Agency at the cost of eugenia, whereas the middle civilizations were organized to limit agency in exchange for dysgenia.
Without Manorialism and Markets (East Asia, Europe) the dysgenia defeats all attempts at preservation of gains. It is not malthus’ numbers that cause dark ages. It is the end of eugenic limitations, let loose by unregulated innovations, that feed regression to the mean, and brought about the Bronze age, Iron Age, and the present Steel Age collapses.
That is why the enlightenment project failed to create either an aristocracy of everyone (British), a middle class of everyone (French and German), or an underclass of everyone (Jewish and Russian). In Europe and east Asia, after more than a thousand years of manorialism, war, disease, and extremely aggressive criminal prosecution, the consequential upward redistribution of reproduction led to distributions that allowed Pareto organization of populations where the ratio of the middle and upper was sufficient to produce surpluses necessary to concentrate capital in multipliers (commons).
But both Hindus (which have yet failed in their project), east Asians (who succeeded under our pressures), and Westerners (who succeeded because of our tradition of empirical law), had an advantage. The Chinese conquered and colonized all border people. The Western Indo Europeans conquered (exterminated) and colonized all border people, and both Europe and east Asia produced homogenous eugenic, agrarian, metalsmithing societies.
Either one is eugenic or dysgenic. The red queen cannot be defeated by any other means. It takes 95 to follow simple instructions, 105 to repair a machine, 115 to learn on one’s own by reading, 120 to design a machine, 130+ to synthesize and communicate ideas, 140+ to invent new ideas. Everyone below that who cannot be put into labor that does not require continuous learning and adaptation.
This is social science. Everything else is religion.
European Truth vs Levantine Critique
Once you grasp that Cosmopolitan (Marxist-Socialist, Postmodern, Libertine, feminist Neoconservative) Critique is an attempt at exclusionary authoritarianism – a modern restatement of the technique applied in Jewish argument and law – it becomes fairly obvious why the combination of:
(a) The desire for obscurant arguments to be true,
(b) Emotional and intellectual investment in the truth of these obscurant arguments, and
(c) Hostility to refutation, are so pervasive:
… … 1) psychological utility obtained from intuitional moral ‘righteousness’,
… … 2) group unity in that moral conviction, and;
… … 3) ostracization of non-believers on the other, are precisely what ‘separatists’ require of a religion.
However, this modern set of religions is pseudo-scientific and pseudo-rational rather than legal, mystical and monotheistic in verbal construction. But the verbal construction is merely a technological advancement over monotheistic mythology, and Jewish dual-ethics-law.
Northern Europeans used truth, property and fighting as the binding commitment to one another, not belief. We used opportunity to join success in a hostile landscape, and they used threat of ostracization in among hostile tribes. We are all the product of our ancient geographies.
The strategies of the weak and small in number, versus the strong and small in number. Both Jewish and Germanic systems of thought evolved for use by small populations.
You will take notice which strategy leads to the construction of vast civilizations, technology, art, science and medicine, and what the other led to – near extermination.
Group Strategy Comparison Chart
............THEM (MIDDLE EAST) VS US (EUROPE) ......................Feminine vs Masculine ............Female and Semitic vs Male and European ......................One Herd vs Many Packs ......................Equality vs Hierarchy ...............Proportionality vs Reciprocity ......................Devotion vs Loyalty ......................Quantity vs Quality ...................Consumption vs Capitalization ...........Private Consumption vs Commons Production ...................Undermining vs Order .....................Authority vs Market .....................Dysgenics vs Eugenics ......Stagnation to Devolution vs Innovation to Evolution
........Other's Responsibility vs Personal Responsibility ..The Men Will Take Care of It vs I(We) Must Take Care of It ....................Parasitism vs Productivity ...........Baiting into Hazard vs Offers of Reciprocity .................False Promise vs Promise .........Plausible Deniability vs Warranty
.............Language (Gossip) vs Action (Engineering) .............Face Before Truth vs Truth Before Face ..........Approval/Disapproval vs True/False ................Reasonableness vs Decidability ............Avoidance by GSRRM vs Truth Regardless of Cost
.................Justification vs Adversarialism ........................Pilpul vs Construction ..Incrementalism via Dialectic vs Decidability vs Argument ......................Critique vs Falsification ................Incrementalism vs Zero tolerance
Abrahamism Is the Greatest Cancer Ever Invented by Man
Our common-law tradition and the militia built the West. We escaped the Abrahamic religion and immediately restored our ancient trajectory. The reason for degeneracy is the reintroduction of Abrahamic Religion in pseudoscientific (Marxist) and pseudo-rational (postmodernist) prose.
Sorry. I have spent extraordinary effort in testing our most cherished beliefs: and Abrahamism created the dark ages. Jews did nothing. We did very little. And Muslims destroyed the four great civilizations of the ancient world – dragging them backward into inescapable ignorance.
Every civilization needs literature, oaths, and festivals for the intergenerational propagation of general rules of decidability that express their group competitive strategy. No civilization needs lies, and Abrahamism in word and form is just lies.
The Jewish Century: Marxism-Socialism, Libertarianism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Neo-Conservatism,
The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science.
The Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique:
Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic)
Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses)
Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes, Pseudo )
Krugman, Stiglitz, Delong (Commercial – Middle, Pseudoeconomics)
Freud, Boaz, Gould (Priestly – Middle)
Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Middle)
Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists)
Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper)
The gradual attack on Aristocratic (Truthful Reciprocal) Civilization from the bottom up.
Compare To: Judaism > Christianity > Islam.
Same Technique, Same False Promise, Same Catastrophic Consequences
How Can We End Abrahamic Deceit Forever?
It’s quite simple. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information.
Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true.
How? Involuntary Warranty of Tests of Due Diligence
1 – Categorical consistency
2 – Logical consistency
3 – Empirical consistency
4 – Operational consistency
5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor)
6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity)
7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.)
8 – Full accounting of content and consequence within those limits.
While this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice.
And all the culture along with it.
And all of mankind as a consequence.
End the invention of lying.
The Truth Is Enough to Restore the West
Truth is enough. End the lies. End The Entire Abrahamic Program of Lies: False Reality, False History, False Promise (Moral Hazard), Pilpul (via positiva sophism), Critique (via negativa sophism), Straw Manning, and the Dysgenic Strategy of the Herd fearing being left behind by their betters.
Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (worship), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what Those Who Lie had promised them.
No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural Peoples. We Must Rule, if Not for The Sake of All Mankind, but Out of Self Defense.
We Know the Name of The Devil
Europeans speak in the language of the gods, written in the hand of the gods: math, science, physical law, natural law, and testimony.
Abrahamism, in the words of Christianity, Islam, Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Libertarianism and Neoconservatism all bait us into hazard – so do Freudianism, Boasianism, Neo-marxism(“Cultural Marxism”, Political Correctness, and Human-Biodiversity-Denialism. They teach us to lie. To Deny the language of the gods, written in the hands of the gods, and our means of transcendence into gods: evolution.
If you are a devil what do you seek? To prevent man’s transcendence into gods. To deny evolution: the means by which we transcend into gods ourselves. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the devil tell us?
The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. False promise of life after death,
false promise of freedom from the physical and natural laws and the demands of evolution that transcend man into gods.
We know the name of the devil.
His name was Abraham.
He was from Ur.