(FB 1549735909 Timestamp)
OUR LANGUAGES DETERMINE OUR ORGANIZATIONS OF RESISTANCE AND REBELLION
Western people have always been tripartite: Fight (rule), Pray (administer), Work (produce), and never developed semitic monopoly (submission to an abstraction).
In our past we had celtic, anglo-saxon, and anglo-saxon-nordic of the common people, anglo-saxon (norman) french of the political class, and the latin and greek of the educated classes.
We had the hearth religion of the common people, the christianity, aryanism and law of the political class, and the law, christianity and philosophy of the educated classes.
When we developed the middle classes, we had the hearth religion of the common people, upward migration of participation into christianity and the law, upward participation participation of the middle and upper classes into law and philosophy, and the gradual exit of classes from christianity, leaving the academy as the survivor of the church, and the church a social group for the lower classes.
This is because law is and philosophy are rational, and therefore problems calculable, and as division of labor increases, complexity arises, wealth is created, demand for consistent rules that limit bad behavior (risk) is amended by greater demand for adaptation, and needs to reason and calculate the continuous unknown in a world of continuous risk offset by continuously improving returns.
All language consists of measurements(nouns, names) and operations(verbs, actions) resulting in calculations (statements, promises) which accumulate into transactions (sentences, paragraphs, arguments), that produce a contract for reciprocal consistency (meaning).
Today we have islam and judaism for the enemy, christianity for those indoctrinated, a range of subjective moralizing for those not so (Gossiping, Shaming, Ridicule, Rallying), the combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and deceit in marxism,socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anarchic denialism, for those indoctrinated by the academy, the allegorical use of literature by the academy, the archaic remnants of philosophical rationalism (the academic version of religion), the law in natural(right), limited(classical), and unlimited(left) forms, the pseudosciences (social) and sciences (physical.)
We have many grammatical paradigms (vocabulary, rules of disambiguation into transactions that I call the ‘grammars’) for use across and within our classes, and with greater or less frequency in different regions, because of origins of regional peoples, and consequent internal migrations.
THE HERD ALL SPEAKS THE SAME LANGUAGE. THE PACKS DONâT.
JULY 22, 2018
The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.
Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.
And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) â as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant
But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.
And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the leftâs parasitism.
So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes â and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.
So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.
The herd all speaks the same language. The packs donât.