(FB 1545315514 Timestamp)
THE DIFFERENCE IN GRAMMARS IS A DIFFERENCE IN METHOD
BTW: Regarding Greg, Richard, (and many others): I respect both of them (and those less well known) and their heroic efforts – and I won’t speak other than in support of them.
But I will ask you to notice in them the study of philosophy and their advocacy by moral and sentimental appeal to generate understanding and consent.
The spectrum of argumentative methods:
1) Religion and Theology to agree on a means of resistance for the collective good.
2) Philosophy and Morality to create understanding and to obtain consent on a collective good.
3) Science, Economics, Law, and War to impose a collective good regardless of resistance, understanding, and consent.
We are and always have been the minority.
We drag mankind behind us on a heavy sled.
There is no sovereignty by undrestanding or consent, only the organized application of violence to deny anyone and everyone the alternative. If they understand and consent all the better. But understanding an consent are not necessary.
This is the difference in my message.