October 30th, 2018 12:24 PM
by Bill Joslin
Truth, as a semantic axiom, with limitless constellations of interpretive frames.
Correspondence presumes an existential frame.
An existential frame provides a means of checking and vetting outside of the presumptions of the context one might bring to an assertion – that being testability of its existence.
This testability then defines the methodology.
The methodology then presumes the existential frame and uses said method to update the interpretive frame.
By doing so a feedback between interpretation, methodology occurs and is measured by existence (what can be measured or observed – and how) this allows both the interpretive frame and methodology to be updated (both are provisional).
This affords the most robust means of coherence to truth (small ‘t’ truth) in the context of truth as a semantic axiom i.e truthful and honest reporting.
(CD: when you can understand and make that argument on your own, ” you are there “.