October 19th, 2018 9:16 AM
ON RUSSELL KIRK AND THE “LITERARY” CONSERVATIVES
I‘ll be less kind. Poetics do nothing more than provide sentimental medication for those who are of like mind, but wanting others to act, unwilling to act, and failing to act, because the poet provides only sedation not a recipe for action. The west begins and ends with the militia and rule of law between the peerage of men of the militia, and that militia’s willingness to use violence to deny power to any but the militia, with the monarch as the judge and general of last resort. Kirk was the end of the line of those who sold aristocratic egalitarianism (paternalistic, sky worshipping, militaristic, expansionist, empirical, technological, militia) in christian robes. And he was the greatest example of the conservative (aristocratic) postware failure to out-nice the anti-national-socialists-facists (marxists, communists, socialists), instead of restore the pre-war innovations of poincare, maxwell, darwin, menger, spencer, nietzsche, and the romanticist movement to restore western civilization to its ancestral (ancient) origins. So understanding the essayists as a catastrophic failure that allowed the destruction of our civilization – and that it was the genetics, magnetic imaging, cognitive science, and pharmaceutical industry that refuted the ant-darwinian socialist pseudosciences. Either you have the will to fight to rule as a means of preventing alternative rule, or you are merely seeking medication to sedate yourself while being decimated, culture-cided, civilization-cided, and genocided.
We are the people of The Real: Reciprocity, Law, Duty, Truth, reason, technology, science, and WAR. Either we fight to preserve it or we die having failed to.