October 17th, 2018 11:32 AM
LAW AND THE LIMITS TO WISDOM LITERATURE (CULTS)
—“I’m concerned that you are unwilling to allow anything outside of your materialist paradigm Curt.”— Claire Rae Randall
No, I am limiting the imaginary (Fictions) to the non-harmful. 😉
I write about the science and LAW of religion. What religions emerge from the science and consequential LAW is not something that terribly much bothers me.
It just can’t be as destructive as the abrahamic religions, or as limiting as the hindu or buddhist, but must do the opposite: provide ability to act, rather than escape.
Stoicism + Mythology + Literature + History will work.
I WRITE SCIENCE OF LAW (TRUTH). It is a via-negativa. A set of LIMITS. WHat people do within those limits is simply another market for productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary exchange, absent imposition upon the accumulated intersets of others by externality.
That which is OUTSIDE of the law violates one of those tests.