While we are talking about:
FEMININE) – Abrahamic (Jewish > Abrahamic > Semitic) Critique (reputation destruction), Pilpul (Excuse making), and Bilbul (retreat to confusion) argument under threat of ostracization which constitute the feminine method of coercion;
– as a counter to –
MASCULINE) – European Logic, Science, History, and Reciprocity(law) under threat of violence, which constitute the male method of coercion;
We must recognize that we have OUR OWN TRAITORS against reciprocity as well:
DEFECTORS) – Abrahamic theology > Socratic Criticism (Critique) > Platonic Justification (Pilpul) > German continental philosophy et al > French enlightenment Philosophy > French Postmodern Philosophy > Anglo female Defectors.
So while we have Feminine antagonists, we also have our own beta-defector/traitors, as competing with our Masculine practitioners of truth, duty, reciprocity, and markets (meritocracy).
This means that we are outnumbered, and that to preserve western excellence and our own genes we must rule out of self defense, if not out of profitable offense.
SANTAGATA’S COMPLETION OF THE JEWISH METHOD
By James Santagata
—“3 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left*
(You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not)
Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for pepper) tiring contortions to exhaust opponent while trying to mock and create the illusion of superior intellect (and morals).
Phase 2: Bilbul – (Hebrew for confusion). If the opponent calls out and crushes the Pilpul, it moves to Bilbul which is to confuse and create habit.
Phase 3 – Bulbul – (Hebrew for “penis” or “dick”, child taunt / usage among Israelis), if one makes it past Pilpul and Bilbul the phase moves to Bulbul, name calling and pure ad hominems.
Phase 1-3 are predictive and simple patterns and techniques to quickly deflect, side step or crush Pilpul, Bilbul and finally Bulbul.
There is a fourth phase but I am still searching for Hebrew or even Yiddish word that would convey that while satisfying the rhyming / semi-alliterative pattern of Pilpul, Bilbul & Bulbul.”—
I’ll tweak (or extend) james’ rather brilliant insight here by saying that the jewish RIGHT does not abandon appeal to reasonableness and complete the adoption of western reciprocity of costs as decidability. So they only argue facts of convenience.
James’ other insight is that the Jews are also pursuing the feminine strategy of “sh-t testing”. In other words, they are creating demand for dominance and we are failing both them and our women.
This last insight of James’, I think, completes the description of jewish behavior as cognitively feminine. It also completes the analysis that they are engaged in conspiracy rather than simply demonstrating the female reproductive instinct that is the product of female evolutionary cognitive bias. It also explains why jews maintained maternal households, and only adopted monogamy in the late middle ages, prior to practicing polygenic reproduction.