-“Here’s what helped me initially understand P law and how it mirrors Natural law: it’s in human nature to want cooperation, to want others to treat you fairly, to want to own property. Works the same in animal kingdom. Laws in Western civilization were based on these principles.”- TruthQuest
SEX DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTION OF THE RED QUEEN
–“Given randomness and uncertainty throughout Universe and Nature from sub-atomic level up to the human kingdom, P Law is the calculation of operations to mirror Natural & Universal laws by bringing order, predictability, homeostasis and ADAPTATION to an entropic human ecosystem?”–
In other words, we are always in a race with the red queen. I think males intuit this constant, and females CAN’T intuit it any more than males intuit the female ‘fear’.
SEX DIFFERENCES IN LOGIC:
Males are more adaptive (Logic: True vs False) Reason, Competitive Advantage(Adaptation), Action(production), Political.
Females are less adaptive (Logic: Approve vs Disapprove) Intuition, harmony(non-adaptation), Experience(consumption), Social.
Scientific = Operational: P-Law is operation(real, operational) logic of possibility.
Philosophical= Verbal: Philosophical logic is set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference.
SCIENTIFIC LOGIC: THE TERNARY TRUTH TABLE V1
Center column = Truth Hierarchy
Center column = Truth Hierarchy
I write proofs from first principles. If I can’t write a proof, I can’t claim my judgments are true. If I can, then I can. This is what separates people who think they know by accident, from people who do know by discipline. Very, very, very few people work from first principles.
The Pre-War European > Germanic > Anglo civilization was the closest to and least divergent from the law of the universe.
Rule ofLaw in the West, means In Concert with And by Adaptation To the laws of the universe.
The west has always practiced ‘science’.
The Laws of the Universe
.. The Formal, Physical, Natural(Behavior), Evolutionary Laws
.. .. The Natural Law of Cooperation
.. .. .. The Natural Law of Conflict Resolution(Reciprocity)
.. .. .. .. The Natural Law of Tort(Property)
.. .. .. .. .. The Common Law
–> The US Const.
LAW IS THE KING OF THE HILL
… … Algorithms
… … … Recipes, Protocols
… … … … Sciences
… … … … … The Law (Descriptive Grammar)
… … … … Narration
… … … Fiction
… … Fictionaisms
You know, every major prediction I’ve made that I can remember back to at least 1983, was spot on. But it doesn’t matter. Because it’s impossible to convince people to act before they can’t escape acting. Why? It’s easier.
Gotta teach Behavioral Econ -> Micro Econ -> Political Economy. Macro is at this point, going to be irrelevant other than at the most abstract level, because the coming financial system reform, maximizing sovereign funds, is going to eliminate the noise in the system.
It’s criminal. So teach behavioral econ and demographics.
PREDICTING SIGNALS NOT NOISE
There is a very great difference between predicting deterministic consequences and predicting the noise within them. If you predict changes in noise you have either inside information or you’re lucky. 😉
Read Mandlebrot’s “Misbehavior”
There is no way that the current order can continue without the previous radical asymmetry of the American economy vs the rest of the world – especially between the wars and the abandonment of socialism and communism.
They won’t act until they have to – and have political cover.
–“Bit off topic question Mr Doolittle. Did you coin a term something like “putting face above truth” (I paraphrase) ?If so I think it’s similar to my term – lawyering.Trying to *appear* correct rather than actually *being* correct…happens often in debates.”–
You’re looking for “Truth before Face vs Face before Truth, vs Face regardless of Truth”.
ie: west, asia, islam
Lawyering is a good vernacular term for “the rhetorical pretense of knowledge not demonstrated” Fraud by Suggestion not yet fraud by omission or declaration.
“The Muslim conquest of India is the bloodiest story in history”-Will Durant
Yep. As bad as the Mesoamericans were – and they were bad – nothing compares to the work of Islam bloody Islam.
And no. Amerindians were brutal vile primitive people who only slightly better.
Q: “What stopped the Hindus fighting back effectively and what was the Islamic competitive advantage?”
Mobile Raiders whose resources are directed to horse and arms can profit by plunder, looting, slaving, destroying and conquest, because they are always superior to landed defenders whose resources must instead be devoted to defensive, static, production.
Q: “How did Slavic states like Novgorod survive and turn the tide against the Turkic & Mongol hordes, what did they do right compared to the Hindus?”
They didn’t. They endured while mongols failed to create a state bureaucracy and formal institutions – instead focusing on extractions – and took advantage of deterministic weakness for rapid aggressive expansion. This remains the Russian strategy today: suffer, wait, sprint.
The founders were trying to escape the parasitism of both church and state, and didn’t want to repeat the same. The federation (not country) left almost everything to the States. The rush for the western expansion, war over it, created the central government they feared.
Jefferson was supporting the rise of the meritocratic middle class, and existing the parasitic church and state. And he wanted to escape what we would call today peasants, but he called people of low character.
Re: Tax Rebellions
And so? The reality was that the crown was no longer paying for defense, and the federal govt had no money, and these people were evading necessary taxes. It’s not like today when we’re complaining about absurd uncontrolled spending and debt. It was a simple economic necessity.
(And liberalism – middle-class rule, that escaped the parasitic burden of church and aristocracy-state, has nothing to do with today’s Left which seeks to RESTORE that parasitism by peasantry(immigrants), academy (church) and state (bureaucracy).
(BTW: Conflating is lying)
A WELCOME APOLOGY
Thank you. Means a lot to me. But the problem remains. Nazis and Christians did the damage to us – not the left or the mainstream. It ended our reach. So like I said the conservative crab bucket makes any organized resistance, rebellion or revolution to save ourselves impossible.
–“I believe you’re 100% right, but to be devil’s advocate for a sec… Not to bust your balls or anything, but if you had put up a more dramatic verbal match with the BLM guy, it may have been the key. Being quick on your feet, like Tommy Robinson”–
Everyone was wrong. Because I made it impossible to bait us into fail. Symbolism is for chicks and children. Men either follow strategy and tactics or they’re children.
Look what the left does: the bait into ‘moments’ that they can misrepresent. Don’t do it. Gandhi until Vikings.